163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8722138)
1. Social work and end-of-life decisions: self-determination and the common good.
Wesley CA
Health Soc Work; 1996 May; 21(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8722138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preserving end-of-life autonomy: the Patient Self-Determination Act and the Uniform Health Care Decisions Act.
Galambos CM
Health Soc Work; 1998 Nov; 23(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 9834880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The case of the coercive family.
Marshall PA; Hartz J; Tan SY
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):135-6; discussion 136-42. PubMed ID: 8032514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking.
Schauer F
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 1479307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suing health care providers for saving lives. Liability for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment.
Rodriguez KF
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):1-66. PubMed ID: 10230150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced directives and the Patient Self-Determination Act.
Sill GM
Mo Med; 1996 Jan; 93(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 8907593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A case for advance directives.
Heitz R
WMJ; 2007 Sep; 106(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 17970017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
Mazzeo KE
Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.
Elliott SJ
Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.
White PD
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 1479306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Advance directives: implications for critical care.
Silverman HJ; Vinicky JK; Gasner MR
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jul; 20(7):1027-31. PubMed ID: 1617972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Cruzan decision and medical practice.
Thomasma DC
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):853-4. PubMed ID: 2025130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues at the end of life.
Young EW
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody.
Savage T; Michalak DR
Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physicians autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Nov; (189):9-34. PubMed ID: 10144585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives: legal remedies and psychosocial interventions.
Lens V; Pollack D
Death Stud; 2000; 24(5):377-99. PubMed ID: 11067672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): new challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities.
Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2007 Sep; 2():19. PubMed ID: 17850664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Acceptance and validation of advanced directives--ethical and clinical considerations].
Sass HM; Kielstein R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(6):121-4. PubMed ID: 9214147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Denounce demagoguery on directives!
Manthous C
Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):1014-5; author reply 1015-6. PubMed ID: 20168176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
