These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8724086)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate?
    Hollowell JP; Vollmer DG; Wilson CR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 May; 21(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 8724086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.
    Lim TH; Kwon H; Jeon CH; Kim JG; Sokolowski M; Natarajan R; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):951-6. PubMed ID: 11317120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support.
    Lowe TG; Hashim S; Wilson LA; O'Brien MF; Smith DA; Diekmann MJ; Trommeter J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2389-94. PubMed ID: 15507800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
    Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The transmission of stress to grafted bone inside a titanium mesh cage used in anterior column reconstruction after total spondylectomy: a finite-element analysis.
    Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Sakamoto J; Yoshida A; Murakami H; Hato T; Awamori S; Oda J; Tomita K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2783-7. PubMed ID: 16371903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density.
    Hasegawa K; Abe M; Washio T; Hara T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):957-63. PubMed ID: 11317121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematics and load-sharing of an anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct with PEEK rods: An in vitro biomechanical study.
    Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu X; Tong J; Ji W; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Dec; 40():1-7. PubMed ID: 27756005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws?
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 20121359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.
    Brodke DS; Gollogly S; Bachus KN; Alexander Mohr R; Nguyen BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1794-801. PubMed ID: 12923465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Spanning a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Cage Across the Vertebral Ring Apophysis Increase Loads Required for Failure and Mitigate Endplate Violation.
    Briski DC; Goel VK; Waddell BS; Serhan H; Kodigudla MK; Palepu V; Agarwal AK; Zavatsky JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1158-E1164. PubMed ID: 28472018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of design and positioning of carbon fiber lumbar interbody cages and their subsidence in vertebral bodies.
    Lam FC; Alkalay R; Groff MW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr; 25(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 21430566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fusion Rates of Different Anterior Grafts in Thoracolumbar Fractures.
    Antoni M; Charles YP; Walter A; Schuller S; Steib JP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E528-33. PubMed ID: 24077416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of interbody cage positioning on lumbosacral vertebral endplate failure in compression.
    Labrom RD; Tan JS; Reilly CW; Tredwell SJ; Fisher CG; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):E556-61. PubMed ID: 16205328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].
    Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
    Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interbody device shape and size are important to strengthen the vertebra-implant interface.
    Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 15770178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Titanium Mesh Cage End Structures on the Compressive Load at the Endplate Interface: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.
    Lu T; Liang H; Liu C; Guo S; Zhang T; Yang B; He X
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Jun; 23():2863-2870. PubMed ID: 28604653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of bioabsorbable multiamino acid copolymer/α-tri-calcium phosphate interbody fusion cages in a goat model.
    Chunguang Z; Yueming S; Chongqi T; Hong D; Fuxing P; Yonggang Y; Hong L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1615-22. PubMed ID: 21270683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new bone surrogate model for testing interbody device subsidence.
    Au AG; Aiyangar AK; Anderson PA; Ploeg HL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(16):1289-96. PubMed ID: 21311401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body.
    Adam C; Pearcy M; McCombe P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 May; 18(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 12689775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.