These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8725013)

  • 1. Do thinner rigid gas permeable contact lenses provide superior initial comfort?
    Cornish R; Sulaiman S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Mar; 73(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 8725013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of topical anesthetic use on initial patient satisfaction and overall success with rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
    Bennett ES; Smythe J; Henry VA; Bassi CJ; Morgan BW; Miller W; Jeandervin M; Henderson B; Elliott L; Porter KS; Barr JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Nov; 75(11):800-5. PubMed ID: 9848833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomised controlled trial of the effects of two rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens materials and two surface cleaners on straylight values.
    Fortuin MF; Schilperoort J; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; van den Berg TJ; Kiers H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):497-508. PubMed ID: 19689546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contact lens wear after photorefractive keratectomy: comparison between rigid gas permeable and soft contact lenses.
    Lim L; Siow KL; Chong JS; Tan DT
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 10555738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of lens parameter variation on rigid gas-permeable lens adherence.
    Swarbrick HA; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Mar; 73(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 8725014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of patient personality profile and verbal presentation on successful rigid contact lens adaptation, satisfaction and compliance.
    Bennett ES; Stulc S; Bassi CJ; Schnider CM; Morgan BW; Henry VA; Henderson B; Roskam S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jul; 75(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 9703038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How rigid gas-permeable lenses supply more oxygen to the cornea than silicone hydrogels: a new model.
    Ichijima H; Cavanagh HD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Sep; 33(5):216-23. PubMed ID: 17873624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nomogram for spherical RGP contact lens fitting in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (PMCD).
    Raizada K; Sridhar MS
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 12861111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomised controlled study comparing comfort-related outcomes between two rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses with different sessile drop contact angles.
    Fortuin MF; Schilperoort J; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; Manon HM; Kiers H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Mar; 31(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 21309806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Edge shape and comfort of rigid lenses.
    La Hood D
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 3177585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rigid gas permeable contact lenses: out in the cold.
    Jackson AJ; Wolsley CJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Oct; 32(5):204-6. PubMed ID: 19596604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction of astigmatism with rigid gas permeable lenses.
    Kastl PR
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2003 Sep; 16(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 14564759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-related barriers to Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) lens wear among keratoconus patients in Jordan.
    Bakkar MM; Haddad MF; Qadire MA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Jun; 41(3):267-272. PubMed ID: 29217454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient preferences and comparative ocular responses to rigid and soft contact lenses.
    Fonn D; Gauthier CA; Pritchard N
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Dec; 72(12):857-63. PubMed ID: 8749332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Giant papillary conjunctivitis associated with rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
    Douglas JP; Lowder CY; Lazorik R; Meisler DM
    CLAO J; 1988; 14(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 3208429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance of polynomial lenses versus tri-curve lenses. I: initial comfort.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Douthwaite W
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2001; 24(3):100-7. PubMed ID: 16303462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The flexure of on-eye rigid gas permeable contact lenses and its relationship with anterior corneal surface].
    Wu J; Yu Q; Zhang H; Dong S; Ye S; Zhang C
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 51(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 25877707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a run-in period to decrease loss to follow-up in the Contact Lens and Myopia Progression (CLAMP) study.
    Walline JJ; Jones LA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Dec; 24(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 14662276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regular replacement of extended wear rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
    Woods CA; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1996 Jul; 22(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 8828933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RGP quality control: the results of a national survey.
    Bennett ES; Grohe RM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Mar; 66(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7730555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.