These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8725131)

  • 1. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears.
    Keyhani-Rofagha S; Palma T; O'Toole RV
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The PAPNET system in cytological rescreening of cervical smears].
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Apr; 49(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 9206764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer].
    Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Automation of cytological analysis of cervical smears].
    Cenci M; Giovagnoli MR; Olla SV; Drusco A; Vecchione A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999; 51(7-8):291-8. PubMed ID: 10536424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
    Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficacy: a study of 63 false-negative smears.
    Boon ME; Kok LP; Nygaard-Nielsen M; Holm K; Holund B
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec; 7(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 7892166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of endocervical component by PAPNET system on negative cervical smears.
    Ashfaq R; Solares B; Saboorian MH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Aug; 15(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 8872433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative cervical smears before CIN 3/carcinoma. Reevaluation with the PAPNET Testing System.
    Doornewaard H; van de Seijp H; Woudt JM; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9022729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy.
    Djemli A; Khetani K; Auger M
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16302251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma.
    Sherman ME; Mango LJ; Kelly D; Paull G; Ludin V; Copeland C; Solomon D; Schiffman MH
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One hundred percent thorough quality control rescreening of liquid-based monolayers in cervicovaginal cytopathology.
    Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Bentz JS
    Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12478679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
    Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
    Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.