These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8725131)

  • 41. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
    Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
    Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. PAPNET computer-aided rescreening for detection of benign and malignant glandular elements in cervicovaginal smears: a review of 61 cases.
    Sturgis CD; Isoe C; McNeal NE; Yu GH; DeFrias DV
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Apr; 18(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 9557269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Results of AutoPap system-assisted and manual cytologic screening. A comparison.
    Wertlake P
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Jan; 44(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9987733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. One laboratory's experience with the PAPNET system.
    Koss LG
    Physician Assist; 1994 Dec; 18(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10139375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effectiveness of cytological rescreening in the reduction of false negative/positive Pap reports.
    Cernescu EC; Anton G; Ruţă S; Cernescu C
    Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 2013; 72(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 24187808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM; Frist S
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rescreen effect in conventional and PAPNET screening: observed in a study using material enriched with positive smears.
    van Ballegooijen M; Beck S; Boon ME; Boer R; Habbema JD
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9755670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Neural network processing can provide means to catch errors that slip through human screening of pap smears.
    Boon ME; Kok LP
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1993 Aug; 9(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 8261846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears.
    Ashfaq R; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7587873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Paired comparison of manual and automated Pap test screening using the PAPNET system.
    Duggan MA; Brasher P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Oct; 17(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 9316778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the PAPNET system for prescreening triage of cervicovaginal smears.
    Ashfaq R; Saliger F; Solares B; Thomas S; Liu G; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 9250299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM; Hlongwane NF; Leiman G
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Observer variation in cytologic grading for cervical dysplasia of Papanicolaou smears with the PAPNET testing system.
    Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; van den Tweel JG
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 87(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 10455204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of PAPNET-assisted cervical rescreening.
    Doornewaard H; Woudt JM; Strubbe P; van de Seijp H; van den Tweel JG
    Cytopathology; 1997 Oct; 8(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 9313983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist.
    Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME; Beck S
    Cytopathology; 1994 Aug; 5(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 7948757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An analysis of the variation of human interpretation: Papnet a mini-challenge.
    Husain OA; Butler EB; Nayagam M; Mango L; Alonzo A
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Feb; 6(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 8167098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Potentially difficult smears of women with squamous cell carcinoma pose fewer problems when PAPNET is used for primary screening.
    Kok MR; Schreiner-Kok PG; Van Der Veen G; Boon ME
    Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):324-34. PubMed ID: 10588351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Technologic advances for evaluation of cervical cytology: is newer better?
    Hartmann KE; Nanda K; Hall S; Myers E
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2001 Dec; 56(12):765-74. PubMed ID: 11753179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
    Duggan MA
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.