These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8725517)

  • 1. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: role of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Tavartkiladze GA; Frolenkov GI; Artamasov SV
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Mar; 116(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 8725517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Tavartkiladze GA; Frolenkov GI; Kruglov AV; Artamasov SV
    Br J Audiol; 1994; 28(4-5):193-204. PubMed ID: 7735147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Changes in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions contralateral suppression in infants].
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16625871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children. pure tone 1.0 kHz and 2.0 kHz suppressive effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Kossowska I; Lisowska G; Urbaniec P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):112-5. PubMed ID: 11318438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction.
    Arslan RB; Ozdamar O; Ulgen Y
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Attempts to find a latency.
    Lind O
    Br J Audiol; 1994; 28(4-5):219-25. PubMed ID: 7735150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of the efferent medial olivocochlear system in contralateral masking and binaural interactions: an electrophysiological study in guinea pigs.
    Aran JM; Pajor AM; de Sauvage RC; Erre JP
    Audiology; 2000; 39(6):311-21. PubMed ID: 11766691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: A normative study.
    Zevenster S; Naudé A
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2022 Dec; 69(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 36546517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.
    Puria S; Guinan JJ; Liberman MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):500-7. PubMed ID: 8568037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delay and temporal integration in medial olivocochlear bundle activation in humans.
    Maison S; Durrant J; Gallineau C; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 11271977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss.
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.