209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8725652)
21. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
Addicott DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Advance directives and voluntary slavery.
Tollefsen C
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 9752581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research ethics.
Aarons D
West Indian Med J; 1995 Dec; 44(4):115-8. PubMed ID: 8838046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.
Katz J
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research.
Benson PR; Roth LH
Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Prussian regulation of 1900: early ethical standards for human experimentation in Germany.
Vollmann J; Winau R
IRB; 1996; 18(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 11654878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Controlled clinical trials: some ethical issues.
Lebacqz K
Control Clin Trials; 1980 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11658626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Research involving children: ethical concerns and dilemmas.
Everson-Bates S
J Pediatr Health Care; 1988; 2(5):234-9. PubMed ID: 3183908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical research with the developmentally disabled.
Weisstub DN; Arboleda-Flórez J
Can J Psychiatry; 1997 Jun; 42(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 9220112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
Annas GJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethical considerations in modern human experimentation.
Steinberg A
Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 2013002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Betting your life: an argument against certain advance directives.
Ryan CJ
J Med Ethics; 1996 Apr; 22(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8731535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Legal and ethical complexities of consent with cognitively impaired research subjects: proposed guidelines.
Berg JW
J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 8925010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Acute care research: is it ethical?
Iserson KV; Mahowald MB
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jul; 20(7):1032-7. PubMed ID: 1617973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Should the Declaration of Helsinki be revised?
Morens DM
N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(24):1851; author reply 1853. PubMed ID: 10610458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Informed consent: some challenges to the universal validity of the Western model.
Levine RJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(3-4):207-13. PubMed ID: 1779688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Introduction (to 6 articles and a position paper on ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research).
High DM; Post SG; Whitehouse PJ
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11657669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Nuremberg Code, German law, and prominent physician-thinkers.
Sass HM
JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(9):709; author reply 709-10. PubMed ID: 9042833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiation.
Rothman DJ
JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):421-3. PubMed ID: 11644795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
