These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8725827)
1. Comparison of the degree of abdominal adhesion formation associated with chromic catgut and polypropylene suture materials. Rochat MC; Lin J; Pope ER; Carson WL; Wagner-Mann CC; Pace LW Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 8725827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats. Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic response to microsuture materials. Beauchamp PJ; Guzick DS; Held B; Schmidt WA J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):615-23. PubMed ID: 2845074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevention of adhesion formation with use of sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane in a rat model of ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh--a randomized, controlled study. Hooker GD; Taylor BM; Driman DK Surgery; 1999 Feb; 125(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 10026756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental comparison of suture materials for tracheal and bronchial anastomoses. Peleg H; Rao UN; Emrich LJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Dec; 34(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 2433801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experimental comparison of Maxon and chromic catgut in suturing of the urinary bladder]. Osterhage HR; Grün BR; Judmann G; Wünsch HP Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3284147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suture sinus formation following closure of ventral midline incisions with polypropylene in three horses. Trostle SS; Hendrickson DA J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Sep; 207(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 7657574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials. Muftuoglu MA; Ozkan E; Saglam A Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hypersensitivity to chromated catgut sutures: a case report and review of the literature. Engler RJ; Weber CB; Turnicky R Ann Allergy; 1986 Apr; 56(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 3963524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of suture materials and suture patterns for inverting intestinal anastomosis of the jejunum in the horse. Dean PW; Robertson JT; Jacobs RM Am J Vet Res; 1985 Oct; 46(10):2072-7. PubMed ID: 3904546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder. Hastings JC; Van Winkle W; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jun; 140(6):933-7. PubMed ID: 1129685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study). Alimoglu O; Akcakaya A; Sahin M; Unlu Y; Ozkan OV; Sanli E; Eryilmaz R Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(51):725-8. PubMed ID: 12828071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A study of uterine adhesions following suturing of the uterus with catgut or Vicryl in cesarean sections in cattle]. De Wit F; Raymakers R; Westerbeek J; Mijten P; De Kruif A Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1993 Aug; 118(15):478-9. PubMed ID: 8367842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue reaction to suture materials in infected surgical wounds--a histopathologic evaluation. Varma S; Johnson LW; Ferguson HL; Lumb WV Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 6277211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues. Walton M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Leroux N; Bujold E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. PubMed ID: 16731075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new synthetic absorbable suture. Postlethwait RW; Smith BM Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Mar; 140(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 123087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon. Hastings JC; Winkle WV; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 May; 140(5):701-7. PubMed ID: 1145404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro biomechanical comparison of the strength of the linea alba of the llama, using two suture patterns. Van Hoogmoed L; Snyder JR; Stover SM; Drake C; Taylor K; Harmon FA; McDuffee L Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):938-42. PubMed ID: 8725826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]