124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8726987)
41. Responsible authorship and peer review.
Wilson JR
Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Apr; 8(2):155-74. PubMed ID: 12092488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Rethinking peer review.
Young K
CMAJ; 2010 Feb; 182(3):281. PubMed ID: 20176769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Ethical issues in research and publication.
Iammarino NK; O'Rourke TW; Pigg RM; Weinberg AD
J Sch Health; 1989 Mar; 59(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 2704180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Radiologic deontology in daily practice].
Temporelli A; Taricco MT
Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4):529-31. PubMed ID: 2244046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. No researcher is too junior to fix science.
Tregoning J
Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):7. PubMed ID: 28470218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Publication objectives and processes at the
Larkin F; Heindl LM; He M; Moosajee M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 105(8):1041-1042. PubMed ID: 33941589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Veterinary radiology in Germany, Switzerland and Austria: a comparative analysis of problems].
Hofmann-Parisot M
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1993 May; 106(5):160-5. PubMed ID: 8512550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Using qualitative research in radiologic technology.
Dowd SB
Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 1736316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Retraction recommended for enzyme-chip paper.
Abbott A
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):540-1. PubMed ID: 20671680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Ethics in radiology].
Wenz W
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 121(9):275-81. PubMed ID: 2024103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The ethics of peer review in bioethics.
Wendler D; Miller F
J Med Ethics; 2014 Oct; 40(10):697-701. PubMed ID: 24131903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sweating at night: some ethical paradoxes confronting social psychological research.
Wiesenthal DL
Soc Sci Med F; 1981 Mar; 15(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 7280727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Standards for authorship and publication in academic radiology. Association of University Radiologists Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
Friedman PJ
Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 8372214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Linking scholarly publications to popular press: an avenue for dissemination.
Porche DJ
Am J Mens Health; 2011 Jan; 5(1):5. PubMed ID: 21278202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Relationships between radiology and industry: accomplishments, opportunities, and ethical concerns.
Rosenquist CJ
Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):315-7. PubMed ID: 1620822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Is authorship sufficient for today's collaborative research? A call for contributor roles.
Vasilevsky NA; Hosseini M; Teplitzky S; Ilik V; Mohammadi E; Schneider J; Kern B; Colomb J; Edmunds SC; Gutzman K; Himmelstein DS; White M; Smith B; O'Keefe L; Haendel M; Holmes KL
Account Res; 2021 Jan; 28(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 32602379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Four observations about "Six Domains of Research Ethics".
Hackett EJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Apr; 8(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 12092492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ethical quandary of authorship.
Supernaw RB
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Feb; 51(3):409. PubMed ID: 8160703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Questionable coauthorship--an erosion of ethical standards.
Simonsen RJ
Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):519. PubMed ID: 7568697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. To the Editor: Peer-Review Authorship-Embedding Recognition and Reward in the Co-Production of Scholarly Publications.
Trethewey SP
J Grad Med Educ; 2022 Apr; 14(2):239. PubMed ID: 35463164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
