These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8727994)
1. Effect of space allowance on barrow performance to 136 kilograms body weight. NCR-89 Committee on Management of Swine. Brumm MC J Anim Sci; 1996 Apr; 74(4):745-9. PubMed ID: 8727994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of space allocation on barrow and gilt performance. Brumm MC J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2460-6. PubMed ID: 15318747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Space requirements of barrows and gilts penned together from 54 to 113 kilograms. NCR-89 Committee on Confinement Management of Swine. J Anim Sci; 1993 May; 71(5):1088-91. PubMed ID: 8505238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of removal and remixing of lightweight pigs on performance to slaughter weights. Brumm MC; Ellis M; Johnston LJ; Rozeboom DW; Zimmerman DR; J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1166-72. PubMed ID: 12019602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of feeder-trough space and variation in body weight within a pen of pigs on performance in a wean-to-finish production system. Wolter BF; Ellis M; Curtis SE; Parr EN; Webel DM J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2241-6. PubMed ID: 12350000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of pigs to space allocation and diets varying in nutrient density. Brumm MC; Miller PS J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2730-7. PubMed ID: 8923187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of floor space allowances on growth performance of finishing pigs marketed at 138 kilograms. Johnston LJ; Rozeboom DW; Goodband RD; Moeller SJ; Shannon MC; Schieck SJ J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4917-4925. PubMed ID: 29293700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of equations to predict the influence of floor space on average daily gain, average daily feed intake and gain : feed ratio of finishing pigs. Flohr JR; Dritz SS; Tokach MD; Woodworth JC; DeRouchey JM; Goodband RD Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29017615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the removal of pigs from a group and subsequent floor space allowance on the growth performance of heavy-weight finishing pigs. Flohr JR; Tokach MD; DeRouchey JM; Woodworth JC; Goodband RD; Dritz SS J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4388-4400. PubMed ID: 27898847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of increasing space allowance by removing a pig or gate adjustment on finishing pig growth performance. Carpenter CB; Holder CJ; Wu F; Woodworth JC; DeRouchey JM; Tokach MD; Goodband RD; Dritz SS J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2659-2664. PubMed ID: 29726991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wean-to-finish feeder space availability effects on nursery and finishing pig performance and total tract digestibility in a commercial setting when feeding dried distillers grains with solubles. Weber EK; Stalder KJ; Patience JF J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1905-15. PubMed ID: 26020213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of restricted postweaning growth resulting from reduced floor and feeder-trough space on pig growth performance to slaughter weight in a wean-to-finish production system. Wolter BF; Ellis M; Corrigan BP; DeDecker JM; Curtis SE; Parr EN; Webel DM J Anim Sci; 2003 Apr; 81(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 12723070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of early postweaning growth rate as affected by diet complexity and space allocation on subsequent growth performance of pigs in a wean-to-finish production system. Wolter BF; Ellis M; Corrigan BP; DeDecker JM; Curtis SE; Parr EN; Webel DM J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 12643477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response of barrows to space allocation and ractopamine. Brumm MC; Miller PS; Thaler RC J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3373-9. PubMed ID: 15542485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of double stocking and weighing frequency on pig performance in wean-to-finish production systems. Wolter BF; Ellis M; DeDecker JM; Curtis SE; Hollis GR; Shanks RD; Parr EN; Webel DM J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1442-50. PubMed ID: 12078723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of split marketing on the physiology, behavior, and performance of finishing swine. Scroggs LV; Kattesh HG; Morrow JL; Stalder KJ; Dailey JW; Roberts MP; Schneider JF; Saxton AM J Anim Sci; 2002 Feb; 80(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 11881923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of feather meal on barrow performance. Ssu KW; Brumm MC; Miller PS J Anim Sci; 2004 Sep; 82(9):2588-95. PubMed ID: 15446474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in growing pigs. Hyun Y; Ellis M J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):803-10. PubMed ID: 11325183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]