259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8728075)
1. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process.
Laverty CR; Farnsworth A; Thurloe JK; Grieves A; Bowditch R
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9196807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
Ferris DG; Berrey MM; Ellis KE; Petry LJ; Voxnaes J; Beatie RT
J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
