These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8728476)

  • 1. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Nielsen LH; Popelka GR; Rasmussen AN; Osterhammel PA
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 8210955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of the 2f
    Wen H; Bowling T; Meaud J
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlea partition. Effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2-f1 and 2f1-f2.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):57-68. PubMed ID: 9387985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation.
    Mills DM; Norton SJ; Rubel EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2108-22. PubMed ID: 8227751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.
    Cheatham MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 24(4):413-428. PubMed ID: 37464091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-tone distortion at different longitudinal locations on the basilar membrane.
    He W; Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 17353104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions and their distortion products in guinea pigs].
    Guo M; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 16(1):63-6, 70. PubMed ID: 12553279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.