These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8728618)

  • 1. Comparative disinfectant efficacy of two disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Key JE; Monnat K
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 8728618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of synthetic Cecropin (D5C) in disinfecting contact lens solutions.
    Sousa LB; Mannis MJ; Schwab IR; Cullor J; Hosotani H; Smith W; Jaynes J
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8728617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for evaluation of compatibility of contact lenses and lens cases with contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Mowrey-McKee M; Borazjani R; Collins G; Cook J; Norton S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 22178791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of organic load.
    Codling CE; Maillard JY; Russell AD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 12695713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficacies of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Amiri MA; Mohammadinia M; Tabatabaee M; Askarizadeh F; Behgozin A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jul; 94(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 21255080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Manuj K; Gunderson C; Troupe J; Huber ME
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Jul; 32(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16845270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility of various corneal fungal isolates and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Pinna A; Usai D; Zanetti S; Thomas PA; Kaliamurthy J
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2013 Mar; 7(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 23493005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact lens disinfecting solutions antibacterial efficacy: comparison between clinical isolates and the standard ISO ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
    Mohammadinia M; Rahmani S; Eslami G; Ghassemi-Broumand M; Aghazadh Amiri M; Aghaie G; Tabatabaee SM; Taheri S; Behgozin A
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Feb; 26(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 22094301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of several current soft contact lens care systems against Aspergillus.
    Connor CG; Presley L; Finchum SM; Steel SA
    CLAO J; 1998 Apr; 24(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 9571267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ozone against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in contact lenses storage cases.
    Oliver JC; Bredarioli PAP; Leandro FD; Ferreira CBRJ; Veiga SMOM; Dias ALT
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2019 Apr; 61():e23. PubMed ID: 31017184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disinfecting activities of non-peroxide soft contact lens cold disinfection solutions.
    Shih KL; Raad MK; Hu JC; Gresh WJ; Jiries SI; Caldwell LJ; Bergamini MV
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 1893538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of multipurpose solutions for rigid gas permeable lenses.
    Boost M; Cho P; Lai S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 16918771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens.
    Miller MJ; Callahan DE; McGrath D; Manchester R; Norton SE
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11215601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates to antibiotics and contact lens multipurpose disinfecting solutions.
    Watanabe K; Zhu H; Willcox M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Dec; 55(12):8475-9. PubMed ID: 25468893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Acanthamoeba protect Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the bactericidal effects of contact lens disinfecting systems?
    Willcox MD; Low R; Hon J; Harmis N
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26 Suppl 1():S32-5. PubMed ID: 9685017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of antibacterial and antifungal effects of rigid gas permeable contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Kuzman T; Kutija MB; Kordić R; Popović-Sui S; Jandroković S; Skegro I; Pokupec R
    Coll Antropol; 2013 Apr; 37 Suppl 1():127-31. PubMed ID: 23837231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.
    Lever AM; Miller MJ
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10073638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact lens storage case hygiene practice and storage case contamination.
    Vijay AK; Willcox M; Zhu H; Stapleton F
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Mar; 41(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 25230082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a warming device on contact lens case contamination.
    Willcox MD; Zhu H; Vijay AK
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Nov; 38(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 22868901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Status of the effectiveness of contact lens solutions against keratitis-causing pathogens.
    Siddiqui R; Lakhundi S; Khan NA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25280981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.