These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8728869)

  • 1. [In vivo measurement of the mineral content of renal calculi by dual-photon absorptiometry. Correlation with its fragility to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy].
    Zanchetta JR; Bogado CE; Sánchez TV; Gigler C; Ghirlanda J
    Medicina (B Aires); 1995; 55(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 8728869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi.
    Azm TA; Higazy H
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2002; 36(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 12201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Madaan S; Joyce AD
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17285020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of artificial neural network and multivariate regression analysis to analyze optimum renal stone fragmentation by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Goyal NK; Kumar A; Trivedi S; Dwivedi US; Singh TN; Singh PB
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 21060176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charlson comorbidity index and success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Hubert KC; Singh M; Zhou EH; Delos Santos G; Stovsky MD
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4733-5. PubMed ID: 19671224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Predicting renal stone fragility against ESWL].
    Sakamoto M
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 86(9):1407-15. PubMed ID: 7474628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?
    Chacko J; Moore M; Sankey N; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1370-3; discussion 1373-4. PubMed ID: 16515999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.
    Abdel-Khalek M; Sheir KZ; Mokhtar AA; Eraky I; Kenawy M; Bazeed M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15204407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stone fragility--measurement of stone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry.
    Sakamoto W; Kishimoto T; Takegaki Y; Sugimoto T; Wada S; Yamamoto K; Maekawa M; Ochi H
    Eur Urol; 1991; 20(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 1752274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.
    Pace KT; Ghiculete D; Harju M; Honey RJ;
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):595-9. PubMed ID: 16006908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.
    Demirkesen O; Onal B; Tansu N; Altintaş R; Yalçin V; Oner A
    Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. PubMed ID: 16413356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy.
    Li WM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Liu CC; Wang CJ; Huang CH; Lee YC
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17851280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ungated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: an initial series.
    Rhee K; Palmer JS
    Urology; 2006 Feb; 67(2):392-3. PubMed ID: 16461092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm.?
    Gofrit ON; Pode D; Meretyk S; Katz G; Shapiro A; Golijanin D; Wiener DP; Shenfeld OZ; Landau EH
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1862-4. PubMed ID: 11586249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy.
    Logarakis NF; Jewett MA; Luymes J; Honey RJ
    J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):721-5. PubMed ID: 10687964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial neural networks in predicting optimum renal stone fragmentation by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a preliminary study.
    Hamid A; Dwivedi US; Singh TN; Gopi Kishore M; Mahmood M; Singh H; Tandon V; Singh PB
    BJU Int; 2003 Jun; 91(9):821-4. PubMed ID: 12780841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.
    Gupta NP; Singh DV; Hemal AK; Mandal S
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10604306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome.
    Ng CF; Wong A; Tolley D
    BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):392-5. PubMed ID: 17433030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-frequency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improves renal pelvic stone disintegration in a pig model.
    Gillitzer R; Neisius A; Wöllner J; Hampel C; Brenner W; Bonilla AA; Thüroff J
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1284-8. PubMed ID: 19159409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
    De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.