136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8730270)
1. Reduction of microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using retentive pins.
Liberman R; Gorfil C; Ben-Amar A
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Apr; 23(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 8730270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
Ozel E; Soyman M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques.
Liberman R; Ben-Amar A; Herteanu L; Judes H
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9049916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin.
Tung FF; Hsieh WW; Estafan D
Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 12004668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of parapulpal pins on conservative restoration of pulpless premolars.
Eli I; Deutsch-Zelevitch E; Gelerenter I; Liberman R
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 7853252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method.
Jawaed NU; Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Ahmed S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Sep; 26(9):748-52. PubMed ID: 27671178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of oxalate desensitizers on the microleakage of resin composite restorations bonded by etch and rinse adhesive systems.
Shafiei F; Motamedi M; Alavi AA; Namvar B
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 21180008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations bonded with six one-step self-etch systems.
Sánchez-Ayala A; Farias-Neto A; Vilanova LS; Gomes JC; Gomes OM
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 23739787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
