These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8730662)

  • 1. Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data.
    Storchi P; Woudstra E
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):637-56. PubMed ID: 8730662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation.
    Ahnesjö A; Saxner M; Trepp A
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 1584117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculation of a pencil beam kernel from measured photon beam data.
    Storchi PR; van Battum LJ; Woudstra E
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Dec; 44(12):2917-28. PubMed ID: 10616145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
    Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of pencil kernel and depth penetration algorithms for treatment planning of proton beams.
    Russell KR; Isacsson U; Saxner M; Ahnesjö A; Montelius A; Grusell E; Dahlgren CV; Lorin S; Glimelius B
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jan; 45(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 10661580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
    McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculation of absorbed dose distributions from dynamic wedges.
    Storchi P; Woudstra E; Verlinde P; Johansson KA; Samuelsson A
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1497-506. PubMed ID: 9651020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A convolution-adapted ratio-TAR algorithm for 3D photon beam treatment planning.
    Zhu XR; Low DA; Harms WB; Purdy JA
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1315-27. PubMed ID: 7476719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo evaluation of a photon pencil kernel algorithm applied to fast neutron therapy treatment planning.
    Söderberg J; Alm Carlsson G; Ahnesjö A
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(20):3327-44. PubMed ID: 14620061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Monte Carlo model of photon beams used in radiation therapy.
    Lovelock DM; Chui CS; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1387-94. PubMed ID: 8531863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On empirical methods to determine scatter factors for irregular MLC shaped beams.
    Georg D; Olofsson J; Künzler T; Karlsson M
    Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2222-9. PubMed ID: 15377088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculation models for determining the absorbed dose in water phantoms in off-axis planes of rectangular fields of open and wedged photon beams.
    Storchi P; Woudstra E
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Apr; 40(4):511-27. PubMed ID: 7610112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitor unit calculation in 6 MV irregularly shaped beams--accuracy in clinical practice.
    Lombardi P; Fiorino C; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):638-44. PubMed ID: 9227259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: Determining equivalent squares of high-energetic photon fields.
    Ringholz J; Wegener S; Sauer OA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1242-1250. PubMed ID: 36289176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors?
    Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van Gasteren JJ; van Kleffens HJ; van der Laarse R; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2369-81. PubMed ID: 9434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametrization of head-scatter factors for rectangular photon fields using an equivalent square formalism.
    Yu MK; Murray B; Sloboda R
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1329-32. PubMed ID: 7476720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pencil beam dose calculation model for CyberKnife system.
    Liang B; Li Y; Liu B; Zhou F; Xu S; Wu Q
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5380. PubMed ID: 27782698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of pencil beam widths for electron-beam dose calculations.
    Antolak JA; Mah E; Scrimger JW
    Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 7609721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.