These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8730963)
1. Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in rabbit tibia using bioresorbable and non-resorbable membranes. Piattelli A; Scarano A; Russo P; Matarasso S Biomaterials; 1996 Apr; 17(8):791-6. PubMed ID: 8730963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone augmentation at titanium implants using autologous bone grafts and a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Lundgren AK; Sennerby L; Lundgren D; Taylor A; Gottlow J; Nyman S Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Apr; 8(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 9758958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes: a histological study in dogs. Al Salamah L; Babay N; Anil S; Al Rasheed A; Bukhary M Odontostomatol Trop; 2012 Jun; 35(138):43-50. PubMed ID: 22988790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone repair of experimentally induced through-and-through defects by Gore-Tex, Guidor, and Vicryl in ferrets: a pilot study. Baek SH; Kim S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):710-4. PubMed ID: 11402287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Mao C; Sato J; Matsuura M; Seto K Chin Med Sci J; 1997 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 11360628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regeneration of segmental diaphyseal defects in sheep tibiae using resorbable polymeric membranes: a preliminary study. Gugala Z; Gogolewski S J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 10206250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Bioresorbable barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration around dental implants]. Kohal RJ; Hürzeler MB Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2002; 112(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 12585214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of high-density versus semipermeable PTFE membranes in an elderly experimental model. Marouf HA; El-Guindi HM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 10673651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Zitzmann NU; Naef R; Schärer P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 9425767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphological and dimensional changes after barrier removal in bone formed beyond the skeletal borders at titanium implants. A kinetic study in the rabbit tibia. Rasmusson L; Sennerby L; Lundgren D; Nyman S Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Apr; 8(2):103-16. PubMed ID: 9758961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barrier membranes on bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria. Ito K; Nanba K; Murai S J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1229-37. PubMed ID: 9848532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable membranes]. Mao C; Sato J; Matsuura M; Seto K Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1997 Dec; 19(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 10453535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early tissue reactions to polylactic acid resorbable membranes: a histological and histochemical study in rabbit. Piattelli A; Scarano A; Coraggio F; Matarasso S Biomaterials; 1998 May; 19(10):889-96. PubMed ID: 9690830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts. Lorenzoni M; Pertl C; Keil C; Wegscheider WA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 9796147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A volumetric study of guided bone regeneration around titanium implants in the New Zealand white rabbit. Pal GL; Stevenson A; Klineberg IJ; Pearson M; Albrektsson T; Johansson C Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 9612980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects. Dupoirieux L; Pourquier D; Picot MC; Neves M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 11289623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmentation of skull bone using a bioresorbable barrier supported by autologous bone grafts. An intra-individual study in the rabbit. Lundgren AK; Lundgren D; Sennerby L; Taylor A; Gottlow J; Nyman S Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Apr; 8(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 9758959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ronda M; Rebaudi A; Torelli L; Stacchi C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 23560678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in rabbit femur using collagen membranes. Caiazza S; Colangelo P; Bedini R; Formisano G; De Angelis G; Barrucci S Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11307408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]