344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8731004)
1. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
Henmi M; Copas JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3153-9. PubMed ID: 12375296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.
Kuhnert R; Böhning D
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2277-96. PubMed ID: 16991109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
Bonett DG
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative methods to evaluate trial level surrogacy.
Abrahantes JC; Shkedy Z; Molenberghs G
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 18559408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
Noma H
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.
Tu D
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 17623350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials using nonsteroidal antiandrogens.
Caubet JF; Tosteson TD; Dong EW; Naylon EM; Whiting GW; Ernstoff MS; Ross SD
Urology; 1997 Jan; 49(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 9000189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
Cohn LD; Becker BJ
Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
