These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8731004)

  • 1. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
    Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3153-9. PubMed ID: 12375296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.
    Kuhnert R; Böhning D
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2277-96. PubMed ID: 16991109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative methods to evaluate trial level surrogacy.
    Abrahantes JC; Shkedy Z; Molenberghs G
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 18559408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
    Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.
    Tu D
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 17623350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials using nonsteroidal antiandrogens.
    Caubet JF; Tosteson TD; Dong EW; Naylon EM; Whiting GW; Ernstoff MS; Ross SD
    Urology; 1997 Jan; 49(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 9000189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
    Cohn LD; Becker BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.