406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8733091)
1. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature.
Sutton R; Bourgeois I
Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Mitsuoka T; Kenny RA; Yeung TA; Chan SL; Perrins JE; Sutton R
Br Heart J; 1988 Oct; 60(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 3056477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Castelnuovo E; Stein K; Pitt M; Garside R; Payne E
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 9(43):iii, xi-xiii, 1-246. PubMed ID: 16266560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.
Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M
Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left atrial appendage function during DDD and VVI pacing.
Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Zuridakis EG; Igoumenidis NE; Vardas PE
Heart; 1997 May; 77(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9196412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up.
Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Edwards SJ; Karner C; Trevor N; Wakefield V; Salih F
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug; 19(65):1-210. PubMed ID: 26293406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
Dretzke J; Toff WD; Lip GY; Raftery J; Fry-Smith A; Taylor R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(2):CD003710. PubMed ID: 15106214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of the P wave at implantation for atrial fibrillation after VVI pacemaker implantation.
Snoeck J; Decoster H; Vrints C; Marchand X; Kahn JC; Verherstraeten M; Berkhof M; Franque L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2077-83. PubMed ID: 1279603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing.
Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O
Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total sympathetic activity and atrial natriuretic factor levels in VVI and DDD pacing with different atrioventricular delays during daily activity and exercise.
Theodorakis GN; Kremastinos DT; Markianos M; Livanis E; Karavolias G; Toutouzas PK
Eur Heart J; 1992 Nov; 13(11):1477-81. PubMed ID: 1334465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].
Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
