These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8733091)
1. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature. Sutton R; Bourgeois I Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term? Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation. Castelnuovo E; Stein K; Pitt M; Garside R; Payne E Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 9(43):iii, xi-xiii, 1-246. PubMed ID: 16266560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias. Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left atrial appendage function during DDD and VVI pacing. Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Zuridakis EG; Igoumenidis NE; Vardas PE Heart; 1997 May; 77(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9196412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up. Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Edwards SJ; Karner C; Trevor N; Wakefield V; Salih F Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug; 19(65):1-210. PubMed ID: 26293406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block. Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. Dretzke J; Toff WD; Lip GY; Raftery J; Fry-Smith A; Taylor R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(2):CD003710. PubMed ID: 15106214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of the P wave at implantation for atrial fibrillation after VVI pacemaker implantation. Snoeck J; Decoster H; Vrints C; Marchand X; Kahn JC; Verherstraeten M; Berkhof M; Franque L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2077-83. PubMed ID: 1279603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation]. Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing. Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total sympathetic activity and atrial natriuretic factor levels in VVI and DDD pacing with different atrioventricular delays during daily activity and exercise. Theodorakis GN; Kremastinos DT; Markianos M; Livanis E; Karavolias G; Toutouzas PK Eur Heart J; 1992 Nov; 13(11):1477-81. PubMed ID: 1334465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?]. Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]