These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8733091)
41. Cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacing compared with ventricular pacing for sinus node dysfunction. Rinfret S; Cohen DJ; Lamas GA; Fleischmann KE; Weinstein MC; Orav J; Schron E; Lee KL; Goldman L Circulation; 2005 Jan; 111(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 15630030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities. Irwin M; Carbol B; Senaratne M; Gulamhusein S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. PubMed ID: 8945043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block]. Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison of clinical aspects among unpaced, ventricular inhibited paced, and physiologically paced groups. Sasaki Y; Shimotori M; Akahane K; Yonekura H; Hirano K; Endoh R; Koike S; Kawa S; Furuta S; Homma T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 1):1575-83. PubMed ID: 2462243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patient with sick sinus syndrome and implanted dual-chamber pacemaker with reduced P-wave duration following low interatrial septal pacing: Case report. Mercik J; Gajek-Marecka A; Zawadzki JM; Sławuta A; Gajek J Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Sep; 100(35):e27076. PubMed ID: 34477142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block. Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Indications for permanent pacing and pacing mode prescription from 1989 to 2006. Experience of a single academic centre in Northern Greece. Styliadis IH; Mantziari AP; Gouzoumas NI; Vassilikos VP; Paraskevaidis SA; Mochlas ST; Boufidou AI; Parcharidis GE Hellenic J Cardiol; 2008; 49(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 18543644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview. Sukhum P Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing]. Lelakowski J; Majewski J; Bednarek J; Szczepkowski J; Machejek J Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Physiologic atrial cardiac pacing for the prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation associated with sick sinus syndrome. Otaki M; Inoue T; Kaneda T; Oku H ASAIO J; 2002; 48(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 11814087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Acquired atrioventricular block in a patient with sinus node disease on single-chamber atrial pacing. Vijayvergiya R; Grover A Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(4):435-6. PubMed ID: 12462677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation. Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Twenty four hour variation in plasma atrial natriuretic factor during VVI and DDD pacing. Vardas PE; Markianos M; Skalidis E; Simantirakis E; Manios E; Papavasiliou E Heart; 1996 Jun; 75(6):620-2. PubMed ID: 8697168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group on pacemaker prescription and on the immediate costs of pacing in the Northern Region. Ray SG; Griffith MJ; Jamieson S; Bexton RS; Gold RG Br Heart J; 1992 Nov; 68(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 1467045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing. Soylu M; Ozdemir O; Geyik B; Ozbakir C; Demir AD; Duru E; Ozbal S; Hekimoglu B; Ozer T; Arda K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1540-4. PubMed ID: 15546310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up. Kuniewicz M; Rydlewska A; Karkowski G; Lelakowska-Pieła M; Majewski J; Lelakowski J Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 25001847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on morbidity and mortality in patients with sinus node disease]. Zanini R; Facchinetti AI; Gallo G; Cazzamalli L; Metra M; Benedini G Cardiologia; 1990 Jun; 35(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 2078840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]