These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8733149)

  • 1. A canonical microfunction for learning perceptual invariances.
    Stone JV
    Perception; 1996; 25(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 8733149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning stereo disparity using temporal smoothness constraints: a computational model.
    Stone JV
    Spat Vis; 1996; 10(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 8817769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning perceptually salient visual parameters using spatiotemporal smoothness constraints.
    Stone JV
    Neural Comput; 1996 Oct; 8(7):1463-92. PubMed ID: 8823943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth.
    Tanabe S; Yasuoka S; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal constraints on visual learning: a computational model.
    Stone JV; Harper N
    Perception; 1999; 28(9):1089-104. PubMed ID: 10694959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor C; Ghose T; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparity averaging across spatial scales.
    Rohaly AM; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(10):1315-25. PubMed ID: 8023439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
    Bishop PO
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
    O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of surface reconstruction from binocular disparity based on standard regularization theory: comparison between "membrane" and "thin-plate" potential energy models.
    Shiraiwa A; Hayashi T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 21987913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms of perceptual learning of depth discrimination in random dot stereograms.
    Gantz L; Patel SS; Chung ST; Harwerth RS
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2170-8. PubMed ID: 17588634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of the influence of segmentation cues on orientation perception.
    Durant S; Clifford CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2934-40. PubMed ID: 16707146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereo and motion cues in preattentive vision processing--some experiments with random-dot stereographic image sequences.
    Pong TC; Kenner MA; Otis J
    Perception; 1990; 19(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 2235284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual artifacts in random-dot stereograms.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    Perception; 2010; 39(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 20465171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information.
    Ishii M
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.