These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Gender stereotyping and decision processes: extending and reversing the gender bias in fame judgments. Buchner A; Steffens MC; Berry DC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11009254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Banaji MR; Greenwald AG J Pers Soc Psychol; 1995 Feb; 68(2):181-98. PubMed ID: 7877095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effect of mood and analytic and intuitive judgement tendencies in the "false-fame" effect]. Hänze M Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1996; 204(2):149-66. PubMed ID: 8659209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender bias in fame judgments: implicit gender stereotyping or matching study phase fame? Steffens MC; Buchner A; Mecklenbräuker S Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 16235635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003). Lien MC; Proctor RW; Ruthroff E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 14640843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: a reply to Greenwald (2005). Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 15709876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Further evidence for systematic reliability differences between explicit and implicit memory tests. Buchner A; Brandt M Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 12613561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II. Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: approaches, assumptions, and evaluation. Wainwright MJ; Reingold EM Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):232-54. PubMed ID: 8733934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004). Murdock B Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 16802885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The availability heuristic: effects of fame and gender on the estimated frequency of male and female names. McKelvie SJ J Soc Psychol; 1997 Feb; 137(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 9121143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments. Hugenberg K; Bodenhausen GV; McLain M J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17144762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The interplay of memory and judgment processes in effects of aging on hindsight bias. Bayen UJ; Erdfelder E; Bearden JN; Lozito JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1003-18. PubMed ID: 16938042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medial prefrontal cortex plays a critical and selective role in 'feeling of knowing' meta-memory judgments. Modirrousta M; Fellows LK Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2958-65. PubMed ID: 18606176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]