167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8734062)
1. Role of proximal electrode position in transvenous ventricular defibrillation.
Nitta J; Khoury DS
Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 8734062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of anodal electrode position on transvenous defibrillation efficacy in humans: a prospective randomized comparison.
Markewitz A; Kaulbach H; Mattke S; Müller D; Bernutz C; Hoffmann E; Weinhold C; Steinbeck G; Reichart B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2193-9. PubMed ID: 9309743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transseptal defibrillation is superior for transvenous defibrillation.
Singer I; Goldsmith J; Maldonado C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 2):229-32. PubMed ID: 7724405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.
Swerdlow CD; Davie S; Kass RM; Chen PS; Hwang C; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Raissi S; Peter CT
Am J Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 76(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 7639162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transvenous defibrillation leads: is there an ideal position of the defibrillation anode?
Trappe HJ; Pfitzner P; Fain E; Dresler C; Fieguth HG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Apr; 20(4 Pt 1):880-92. PubMed ID: 9127392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of electrode size on transvenous defibrillation energy requirements: a prospective evaluation.
Halperin BD; Reynolds B; Fain ES; Ligon DA; Silka MJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Apr; 20(4 Pt 1):893-8. PubMed ID: 9127393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of malpositioned transvenous leads on defibrillation efficacy with and without a subcutaneous array electrode.
Usui M; Walcott GP; KenKnight BH; Walker RG; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2008-16. PubMed ID: 8552514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distal right ventricular coil position reduces defibrillation thresholds.
Rashba EJ; Bonner M; Wilson J; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10):1036-40. PubMed ID: 14521655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A permanent transvenous lead system for an implantable pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator. Nonthoracotomy approach to implantation.
Yee R; Klein GJ; Leitch JW; Guiraudon GM; Guiraudon CM; Jones DL; Norris C
Circulation; 1992 Jan; 85(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 1728450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multifilamented electrode in the middle cardiac vein reduces energy requirements for defibrillation in the pig.
Roberts PR; Allen S; Betts T; Urban JF; Euler DE; Crick S; Anderson RH; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
Heart; 2000 Oct; 84(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 10995416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marked reduction of ventricular defibrillation threshold by application of an auxiliary shock to a catheter electrode in the left posterior coronary vein of dogs.
Kenknight BH; Walker RG; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 10969753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators.
Bardy GH; Hofer B; Johnson G; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Gleva M; Mitchell R; Kelso D
Circulation; 1993 Apr; 87(4):1152-68. PubMed ID: 8462144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads: effect of transvenous electrode polarity on defibrillation threshold.
Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Isbruch F; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 5(11):912-8. PubMed ID: 7889231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
