These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8735069)

  • 1. Effects of noise and exercise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Engdahl B
    Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 93(1-2):72-82. PubMed ID: 8735069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Vázquez AE; Jimenez AM; Martin GK; Luebke AE; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure.
    Eddins AC; Zuskov M; Salvi RJ
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):119-28. PubMed ID: 9925023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults.
    Seixas NS; Kujawa SG; Norton S; Sheppard L; Neitzel R; Slee A
    Occup Environ Med; 2004 Nov; 61(11):899-907. PubMed ID: 15477283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Howard MA; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Marshall L; Heller LM
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):307-22. PubMed ID: 15457813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of impulse noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Balatsouras DG; Tsimpiris N; Korres S; Karapantzos I; Papadimitriou N; Danielidis V
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Sep; 44(9):540-9. PubMed ID: 16238185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after a 2-kHz monaural sound-exposure in humans: effects on fine structures.
    Aranda de Toro MA; Ordoñez R; Reuter K; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3568-76. PubMed ID: 21218889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Amplitude changes in distortion products of otoacoustic emissions after acute noise exposure].
    Oeken J; Menz D
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 May; 75(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 8672208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modification of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music.
    Bhagat SP; Davis AM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 47(12):751-60. PubMed ID: 19085399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of short-term pure tone exposure on amplitude of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and spectral history].
    Li H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 13(4):152-4. PubMed ID: 12563988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: II. Prediction of chronic-noise effects by brief pure-tone exposures.
    Mensh BD; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8276733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overexposure effects of a 1-kHz tone on the distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Reuter K; Ordoñez R; Hammershoi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):378-86. PubMed ID: 17614497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.