173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8735257)
1. Automated analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1996 May; 41(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 8735257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Little L; Lockwood G; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Oct; 5(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 8972250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk.
Byng JW; Yaffe MJ; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL; Boyd NF
Cancer; 1997 Jul; 80(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 9210710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.
Torres-Mejía G; De Stavola B; Allen DS; Pérez-Gavilán JJ; Ferreira JM; Fentiman IS; Dos Santos Silva I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1052-9. PubMed ID: 15894652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density.
Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell E; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():S47-55. PubMed ID: 10866036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes.
Thiele DL; Kimme-Smith C; Johnson TD; McCombs M; Bassett LW
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 9157269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.
Aitken Z; McCormack VA; Highnam RP; Martin L; Gunasekara A; Melnichouk O; Mawdsley G; Peressotti C; Yaffe M; Boyd NF; dos Santos Silva I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Feb; 19(2):418-28. PubMed ID: 20142240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
