These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Double indicator methods for monitoring in the intensive care unit]. Hoeft A Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1996 May; 31(1 Suppl):S26-9. PubMed ID: 8737536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. LiDCO systems. Sundar S; Panzica P Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2010; 48(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 20065728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. When to recalibrate the PiCCO? From a physiological point of view, the answer is simple. Bendjelid K Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 May; 53(5):689-90. PubMed ID: 19419373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Respiration monitoring; an unusual application of used thermodilution catheters]. Boland DM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Nov; 128(44):2084-6. PubMed ID: 6504201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is continuous really continuous? Buhre W; Rex S Crit Care Med; 2008 Feb; 36(2):628-30. PubMed ID: 18216618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Continuous recording of cardiac output volume with the OptiQ system--experiences with clinical application]. Soukup J; Henze D; Trawiel C; Trommler P; Hennig C; Radke J; Menzel M Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2000; 25(6):158-63. PubMed ID: 11194384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Continuous stroke volume monitoring as "hemodynamic online monitoring" in polytrauma intensive care patients: technically possible--clinically necessary?]. Stiletto R; Hünerkopf M; Schnabel M; Gotzen L; Baacke M Unfallchirurg; 2001 Nov; 104(11):1043-7. PubMed ID: 11760335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery. Fakler U; Pauli Ch; Balling G; Lorenz HP; Eicken A; Hennig M; Hess J J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Jan; 133(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 17198817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring using USCOM in HEMS at the scene. Knobloch K J Trauma; 2007 Apr; 62(4):1069-70; author reply 1070. PubMed ID: 17426584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Arterial pressure-based technologies: a new trend in cardiac output monitoring. Headley JM Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2006 Jun; 18(2):179-87, x. PubMed ID: 16728303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SvO2 monitoring: Part I. Clinical case application. Briones TL Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1988; 7(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 3356177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Right ventricular ejection fraction catheter: toy or tool? Con: a premature step. Schauble JF J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1993 Apr; 7(2):241-2. PubMed ID: 8477035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Right ventricular ejection fraction catheter: toy or tool? Pro: a useful monitor. Hines R; Rafferty T J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1993 Apr; 7(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 8477034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Hamzaoui O; Monnet X; Richard C; Osman D; Chemla D; Teboul JL Crit Care Med; 2008 Feb; 36(2):434-40. PubMed ID: 18091547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]