These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8738001)

  • 1. Digital subtraction arthrography in preoperative evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty.
    Ginai AZ; van Biezen FC; Kint PA; Oei HY; Hop WC
    Skeletal Radiol; 1996 May; 25(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 8738001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    von Knoch M; Barden B; Saxler G; Löer F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Dec; 49(12):351-5. PubMed ID: 15655928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction.
    Walker CW; FitzRandolph RL; Collins DN; Dalrymple GV
    Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 1925670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques to assess aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement.
    Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; David EF; Pijpers R; Molenaar MA; Hoekstra OS; Berkhof J; Manoliu RA; Teule GJ; Heyligers IC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 15523018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of a loose acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis: a systematic review.
    Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; Deville WL; Berkhof J; Hooft L; Heyligers IC
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 17826271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Ovesen O; Riegels-Nielsen P; Lindequist S; Jensen I; Munkner T; Torfing T; Marving J
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Sep; 18(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 14513446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the assessment of aseptic femoral component loosening.
    Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; Berkhof J; David EF; Pijpers R; Molenaar MA; Hoekstra OS; Teule GJ; Heyligers IC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 16547724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of subtraction arthrography, radionuclide arthrography and conventional plain radiography to assess loosening of total knee arthroplasty.
    Marx A; Saxler G; Landgraeber S; Löer F; Holland-Letz T; von Knoch M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 May; 50(5):143-7. PubMed ID: 15966619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of subtraction arthrography in total hip arthroplasties.
    Barentsz JO; Lemmens JM; Slooff TJ
    Rofo; 1986 Apr; 144(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 3008258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms, and sequential plain radiographs in the assessment of painful hip arthroplasty.
    Miniaci A; Bailey WH; Bourne RB; McLaren AC; Rorabeck CH
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Jun; 5(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 2358813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The methods and place of digital subtraction arthrography of the hip in detecting endoprosthesis loosening].
    Fink BK; Fink U; Hansen M; Kirsch CM; Pfahler M
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 1912544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of contrast and subtraction arthrography in the assessment of aseptic loosening of total hip prostheses: a meta-analysis.
    Temmerman OP; Heyligers IC; Teule GJ; Hoekstra OS; Raijmakers PG
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 56(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 15893898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in determination of indications and planning of revision surgery in total hip replacement].
    Seifert JD; Seifert J; Goymann V; Stuckmann B; Patsalis T; Müller RT
    Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 11293856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value of the plain roentgen image and arthrography in diagnosis of loosening of cemented hip endoprostheses].
    Greiner B; Braun M; Becker W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 9381764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. K-edge digital subtraction arthrography of the painful hip prosthesis: a feasibility study.
    Kelcz F; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; DeSmet A; McBeath AA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Nov; 155(5):1053-8. PubMed ID: 2120935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening.
    Oyen WJ; Lemmens JA; Claessens RA; van Horn JR; Slooff TJ; Corstens FH
    J Nucl Med; 1996 Jan; 37(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8544004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of imaging in loosening of hip arthroplasty in 326 consecutive cases.
    Pfahler M; Schidlo C; Refior HJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1998; 117(4-5):205-7. PubMed ID: 9581245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiographic findings in painful hip arthroplasties.
    Lyons CW; Berquist TH; Lyons JC; Rand JA; Brown ML
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 May; (195):239-51. PubMed ID: 3856499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital arthrography in the evaluation of painful joint prostheses.
    Resnick D; Kerr R; Andrè M; Guerra J; Cone RO; Atkinson D; Pineda C
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(5):432-7. PubMed ID: 6392154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.