278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8738083)
1. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.
Runck F; Steiner RP; Bautz WA; Lell MM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1736-42. PubMed ID: 18635618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carotid stenosis by digital subtraction angiography: reproducibility of the European Carotid Surgery Trial and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement methods and visual interpretation.
Vanninen R; Manninen H; Koivisto K; Tulla H; Partanen K; Puranen M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Oct; 15(9):1635-41. PubMed ID: 7847206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; van der Lugt A; Bartels LW; Mali WP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.
U-King-Im JM; Trivedi RA; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Hollingworth W; Graves M; Joubert I; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Stroke; 2004 Sep; 35(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 15243149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of DSA in carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between stenosis measured on carotid endarterectomy specimens and DSA in 644 cases.
Svoboda N; Bradac O; Mandys V; Netuka D; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3197-3202. PubMed ID: 35945355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of multislice CT angiography and MR angiography in assessing the degree of carotid artery stenosis in consideration of different methods of postprocessing.
Hackländer T; Wegner H; Hoppe S; Danckworth A; Kempkes U; Fischer M; Mertens H; Caldwell JH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 16778618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The significance of MR angiography for the diagnosis of carotid stenoses].
Michaely HJ; Herrmann KA; Kramer H; Laub G; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Radiologe; 2004 Oct; 44(10):975-84. PubMed ID: 15549221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.
Eliasziw M; Smith RF; Singh N; Holdsworth DW; Fox AJ; Barnett HJ
Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
