These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8738448)

  • 1. An update on orthotic devices for the lumbar spine based on a review of the literature.
    Calmels P; Fayolle-Minon I
    Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1996 Apr; 63(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 8738448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spinal orthoses.
    Levine AM
    Am Fam Physician; 1984 Mar; 29(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 6230906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical effectiveness studies of lumbar spine orthoses.
    Nachemson A; Schultz A; Andersson G
    Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1983; 9():139-49. PubMed ID: 6232699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
    Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
    Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.
    Ivanov AA; Kiapour A; Ebraheim NA; Goel V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E162-9. PubMed ID: 19247155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three lumbar orthoses using motion assessment during task performance.
    Krag MH; Fox MS J; Haugh LD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2359-67. PubMed ID: 14560084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of leg length discrepancy on spinal motion during gait: three-dimensional analysis in healthy volunteers.
    Kakushima M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):2472-6. PubMed ID: 14595166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional evaluation of lumbar orthosis effects on spinal behavior.
    Tuong NH; Dansereau J; Maurais G; Herrera R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 9505251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
    Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I. Restriction of gross body motions.
    Lantz SA; Schultz AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):834-7. PubMed ID: 3810301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of slip severity and loading directions on the stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a finite element model study.
    Natarajan RN; Garretson RB; Biyani A; Lim TH; Andersson GB; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1103-12. PubMed ID: 12782976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar spine stabilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis: evaluation with video fluoroscopy.
    Vander Kooi D; Abad G; Basford JR; Maus TP; Yaszemski MJ; Kaufman KR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14699284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vibration modes of injured spine at resonant frequencies under vertical vibration.
    Guo LX; Zhang M; Zhang YM; Teo EC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):E682-8. PubMed ID: 19730200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of lumbosacral orthoses on spine stability: what changes in EMG can be expected?
    Cholewicki J
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Sep; 22(5):1150-5. PubMed ID: 15304292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
    Lehman RA; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.