These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8738448)

  • 21. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments--a finite element model study.
    Ruberté LM; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
    J Biomech; 2009 Feb; 42(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 19136113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
    Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
    van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review of outcome studies.
    Inamasu J; Guiot BH
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Dec; 48(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 16432783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
    Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
    Zanoli G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intervertebral stiffness of the spine is increased by evoked contraction of transversus abdominis and the diaphragm: in vivo porcine studies.
    Hodges P; Kaigle Holm A; Holm S; Ekström L; Cresswell A; Hansson T; Thorstensson A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(23):2594-601. PubMed ID: 14652476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
    Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. II. Effect on trunk muscle myoelectric activity.
    Lantz SA; Schultz AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):838-42. PubMed ID: 3810302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System.
    Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Spinal orthoses in the treatment of vertebral fractures with osteoporosis : A systematic review article].
    Pfeifer M; Gehlen M; Hinz C
    Z Rheumatol; 2017 Dec; 76(10):860-868. PubMed ID: 29143126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conservative options in the management of spinal disorders, Part I. Bed rest, mechanical and energy-transfer therapies.
    Reitman C; Esses SI
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1995 Feb; 24(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 7613975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of cervical orthoses in limiting hyperextension and lateral flexion in football.
    Hovis WD; Limbird TJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Jul; 26(7):872-6. PubMed ID: 7934761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of motion restriction and trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs).
    Cholewicki J; Alvi K; Silfies SP; Bartolomei J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 14526195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.