299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8738551)
21. Sons and daughters in China.
Robey B
Asian Pac Cens Forum; 1985 Nov; 12(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 12267834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sex preference in South Asia: Sri Lanka an outlier.
Abeykoon AT
Asia Pac Popul J; 1995 Sep; 10(3):5-16. PubMed ID: 12290695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Daughter neglect, women's work, and marriage: Pakistan and Bangladesh compared.
Miller BD
Med Anthropol; 1984; 8(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 6536850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Let her die.
Cowan B
Indian J Matern Child Health; 1990; 1(4):127-8. PubMed ID: 12346026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variation and change in fertility in West Central Nepal.
Folmar S
Hum Ecol; 1992; 20(2):225-48. PubMed ID: 12288806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is son preference slowing down India's transition to low fertility?
Mutharayappa R; Choe MK; Arnold F; Roy TK
Natl Fam Health Surv Bull; 1997 Jan; (4):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Son preference in Pakistan: an analysis of intentions vs. behavior.
De Tray D
Res Popul Econ; 1984; 5():185-200. PubMed ID: 12266412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sex composition and its impact on future childbearing: a longitudinal study from urban Uttar Pradesh.
Rajan S; Nanda P; Calhoun LM; Speizer IS
Reprod Health; 2018 Feb; 15(1):35. PubMed ID: 29486802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the correlates of desired family size in Shaanxi, China.
Zick CD; Xiang N
Soc Biol; 1994; 41(3-4):150-67. PubMed ID: 7761902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The social context of family size preferences and fertility behaviour in a south Indian village.
Dharmalingam A
Genus; 1996; 52(1-2):83-103. PubMed ID: 12347420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Son preference in Vietnam.
Haughton J; Haughton D
Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(6):325-7. PubMed ID: 8826072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Desired family size and son preference among Hispanic women of low socioeconomic status.
Unger JB; Molina GB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(6):284-7. PubMed ID: 9429876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does women's literacy affect desired fertility and contraceptive use in rural-urban Pakistan?
Zaki KP; Johnson NE
J Biosoc Sci; 1993 Oct; 25(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 8227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preferences for sex of children: a multivariate analysis.
Krishnan V
J Biosoc Sci; 1987 Jul; 19(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 3624297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intention versus behaviour in parental sex preferences among the Mukogodo of Kenya.
Cronk L
J Biosoc Sci; 1991 Apr; 23(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 2061350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sex preference and third birth intervals in a traditional Indian society.
Nath DC; Land KC
J Biosoc Sci; 1994 Jul; 26(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 7929485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Family size, sex composition of children and contraceptive use: a case study of Kerala.
Suchindran CM; Ramakumar R; Sathi Devi K
Genus; 1993; 49(1-2):165-80. PubMed ID: 12345254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of family sex composition on fertility desires and family planning behaviors in urban Uttar Pradesh, India.
Calhoun LM; Nanda P; Speizer IS; Jain M
Reprod Health; 2013 Sep; 10():48. PubMed ID: 24025670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gender difference in child mortality.
Ahmed FA
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev; 1990 Dec; 24(2):60-79. PubMed ID: 12343742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relative impacts of vertical and integrated FP/MCH programs in rural Nepal.
Tuladhar JM; Stoeckel J
Stud Fam Plann; 1982 Oct; 13(10):275-86. PubMed ID: 6965178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
