189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8738767)
1. Progress report of an external quality assessment scheme for cyclosporine assay.
Zucchelli GC; Pilo A; Chiesa MR; Scarlattini M; Bizollon CA
Ther Drug Monit; 1996 Jun; 18(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 8738767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of cyclosporine by liquid chromatography and three immunoassays in blood from liver, cardiac, and renal transplant recipients.
McBride JH; Kim SS; Rodgerson DO; Reyes AF; Ota MK
Clin Chem; 1992 Nov; 38(11):2300-6. PubMed ID: 1424128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The EMIT Cyclosporine Assay: development of application protocols for the Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 and 917 analyzers.
Dias VC; Legatt DF; Yatscoff RW
Clin Biochem; 1997 Mar; 30(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 9127698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerable lack of agreement between S-FPIA and EMIT cyclosporine assay in therapeutic drug monitoring, of heart transplant recipients.
Regazzi MB; Molinaro M; Tinelli C; D'Eril GM; Goggi C; Campana C; Fiorito V; Moratti R; Viganò M
Ther Drug Monit; 2000 Dec; 22(6):712-5. PubMed ID: 11128239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of cyclosporine assays using sequential samples from selected transplant patients.
LeGatt DF; Coates JE; Simpson AI; Shalapay CE; Rintoul BJ; Yatscoff RW
Clin Biochem; 1994 Feb; 27(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8200114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical evaluation of TDx cyclosporine and metabolites fluorescence polarization immunoassay and comparison with the Cyclo-Trac RIA kit.
Montojo C; Calvo MV; Domínguez-Gil A
J Clin Pharm Ther; 1990 Feb; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2180968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the AxSYM monoclonal cyclosporin assay and comparison with radioimmunoassay.
Sabaté I; Ginard M; González JM; Baró E; Acebes G; Cuadros J; Lirón FJ
Ther Drug Monit; 2000 Aug; 22(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 10942190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations 2 hours post-dose determined using 3 different methods and trough level in pediatric renal transplantation.
Rodríguez E; Delucchi MA; Cano F; Valdebenito S; Castillo MC; Villegas R
Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3354-7. PubMed ID: 16298594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cyclosporine measurement in whole blood by high-performance liquid chromatography, monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and monoclonal enzyme-multiplied immunoassay.
Dusci LJ; Hackett LP; Chiswell GM; Ilett KF
Ther Drug Monit; 1992 Aug; 14(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 1519308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole-blood cyclosporin G in renal transplant recipients determined by two immunoassays and liquid chromatography.
McBride JH; Kim SS; Danovitch GM; Rodgerson DO; Reyes AF; Ota MK
Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1415-9. PubMed ID: 8330399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclosporine A monitoring in patients with renal, cardiac, and liver transplants: a comparison between fluorescence polarization immunoassay and two different RIA methods.
Bergan S; Rugstad HE; Stokke O; Bentdal O; Frøysaker T; Bergan A
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1993 Aug; 53(5):471-7. PubMed ID: 8210969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Homogenous enzyme immunoassay for cyclosporine in whole blood using the EMIT 2000 cyclosporine specific assay with the COBAS MIRA-plus analyzer.
Kimura S; Iyama S; Yamaguchi Y; Kanakura Y
J Clin Lab Anal; 2001; 15(6):319-23. PubMed ID: 11793432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance and specificity of monoclonal immunoassays for cyclosporine monitoring: how specific is specific?
Steimer W
Clin Chem; 1999 Mar; 45(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 10053038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The TDx assay for cyclosporine and its metabolites in blood samples compared with HPLC and RIA methods.
Zucchelli GC; Pilo A; Clerico A; Masini S; Zoppi F; Bovati ML; Spaggiari P; Bertelli A
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1989; 15(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 2673715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cyclosporine metabolite cross-reactivity in different cyclosporine assays.
Murthy JN; Yatscoff RW; Soldin SJ
Clin Biochem; 1998 Apr; 31(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 9629489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninterchangeability of specific radioimmunoassay and monoclonal antibody fluorescent polarization immunoassay in cyclosporine measurements.
Pape D; Vernillet L; Bellissant E; Bentue-Ferrer D; Allain H
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 1996; 10(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 8902552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a monoclonal antibody fluorescent polarization immunoassay with monoclonal antibody radioimmunoassay for cyclosporin determination in whole blood.
Alvarez JS; Sacristan JA; Alsar MJ
Ther Drug Monit; 1992 Feb; 14(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 1546394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analyses of cyclosporine in whole blood and plasma by radioimmunoassay, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and high-performance liquid chromatography.
Lindholm A; Henricsson S
Ther Drug Monit; 1990 Jul; 12(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 2396308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the TDx method for cyclosporine and a comparison to CYCLO-Trac RIA in renal transplant patients.
Vandenbroucke AC
Clin Biochem; 1988 Oct; 21(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 3069244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay for cyclosporine specific? Comparison with specific radioimmunoassay.
Armijo JA; Navarro FA; Angeles de Cos M
Ther Drug Monit; 1992 Aug; 14(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 1519309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
