These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8739066)

  • 1. Transcervical intrauterine embryo transfer (ET) with a new everting catheter and "peel-back" technique.
    Zoll CC; Bauer O; al Hasani S; Kaisi M; Diedrich C; Diedrich K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 May; 13(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 8739066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Firm versus soft embryo transfer catheters under ultrasound guidance: does catheter choice really influence the pregnancy rates?
    Aboulfotouh I; Abou-Setta AM; Khattab S; Mohsen IA; Askalani A; El-Din RE
    Fertil Steril; 2008 May; 89(5):1261-1262. PubMed ID: 17644096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cook versus Edwards-Wallace: are there differences in flexible catheters?
    Boone WR; Johnson JE; Blackhurst DM; Crane MM
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Jan; 18(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11292989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective randomized controlled trial of Wallace and Rocket embryo transfer catheters.
    El-Shawarby SA; Ravhon A; Skull J; Ellenbogen A; Trew G; Lavery S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Oct; 17(4):549-52. PubMed ID: 18854110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single- and double-lumen needles for oocyte harvesting.
    Reeves G
    J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1989 Dec; 6(6):353-5. PubMed ID: 2634721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Wallace malleable stylet for difficult embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization program: a case-control study.
    Nielsen IK; Lindhard A; Loft A; Ziebe S; Andersen AN
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Feb; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11942903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Erlangen in-vitro fertilization program--results to date].
    Trotnow S; Kniewald T; Hünlich T; Kreuzer E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Jun; 44(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 6564977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization.
    Mansour R; Aboulghar M; Serour G
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Oct; 54(4):678-81. PubMed ID: 2209889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of delayed versus immediate embryo transfer catheter removal on pregnancy outcomes during fresh cycles.
    Sroga JM; Montville CP; Aubuchon M; Williams DB; Thomas MA
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):2088-90. PubMed ID: 20116786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Egbase PE; al-Sharhan M; al-Othman S; al-Mutawa M; Udo EE; Grudzinskas JG
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1687-9. PubMed ID: 8921117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The technique for human embryo transfer at Tygerberg Hospital.
    Kruger TF; Stander FS; van der Merwe JP; Smith K; Menkveld R
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1986; 17(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 3739557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Embryo location in the uterus during embryo transfer: An in vitro simulation.
    Mo J; Yang Q; Xia L; Niu Z
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240142. PubMed ID: 33017457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embryo Transfer with Controlled Injection Speed to Increase Pregnancy Rates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Caanen MR; van der Houwen LE; Schats R; Vergouw CG; de Leeuw B; Lambers MJ; Groeneveld E; Lambalk CB; Hompes PG
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(5):394-404. PubMed ID: 27116006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difficulty of embryo-transfer (ET) and pregnancy rate based on the uterocervical angle.
    Komaki A; Qian X; Shibata N; Koyama N
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2008; 35(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18390074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program.
    Wisanto A; Janssens R; Deschacht J; Camus M; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem AC
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Jul; 52(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 2744191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instruments for human in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Lauritsen JG; Lindenberg S; Lenz S
    Dan Med Bull; 1983 May; 30(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 6861529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program.
    De Placido G; Wilding M; Stina I; Mollo A; Alviggi E; Tolino A; Colacurci N; De ML; Marino M; Dale B
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2002 Jan; 19(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 11893010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the Presence of Blood in the Catheter or the Degree of Difficulty of Embryo Transfer Affect Live Birth?
    Plowden TC; Hill MJ; Miles SM; Hoyt B; Yauger B; Segars JH; Csokmay JM; Chason RJ
    Reprod Sci; 2017 May; 24(5):726-730. PubMed ID: 27655772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A postal survey of embryo transfer practice in the UK.
    Salha OH; Lamb VK; Balen AH
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Apr; 16(4):686-90. PubMed ID: 11278219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Initial results of a cryopreservation program for human ova and embryos].
    Feichtinger W; Kafka I; Kogosowski A; Kemeter P
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(5):305-15. PubMed ID: 3705794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.