These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 873943)

  • 1. Wear of dental amalgam.
    Roberts JC; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1977 Jul; 11(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 873943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Brush abrasion with 27 commercial composites and their surface changes in the scanning electron microscope].
    Soltész U; Klaiber B; Schlude V
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):502-5. PubMed ID: 6931812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Abrasion measurements in vivo in occlusal composite and amalgam fillings].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Sep; 33(9):617-22. PubMed ID: 279445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative in vivo wear-resistance measurements between amalgam and composite materials. Results after 2 years].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 6931810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study on the abrasion behavior of composite filling materials].
    Soltész U; Klaiber B; Pergande C; Richter H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 May; 34(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 288560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Test of wear resistance in composites for Class I and II and silver amalgam].
    Rocchetti V; Savoldi E; Paganelli C; Conti GF; Ragni G; Marchesani A
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1987; 7(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 3483537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the abrasive wear resistance between amalgams, hybrid composite material and different dental cements.
    Gil FJ; Espias A; Sánchez LA; Planell JA
    Int Dent J; 1999 Dec; 49(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 10907431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():9-18. PubMed ID: 8935089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-body abrasion of commercial and experimental restorative and coating resins and an amalgam.
    Powers JM; Allen LJ; Craig RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1118-22. PubMed ID: 4610026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the lateral dental region].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Mar; 33(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 274270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface failure of commercial and experimental restorative resins.
    Powers JM; Roberts JC; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 1063753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should I be using amalgam or composite restorative materials?
    Phillips RW
    Int Dent J; 1975 Dec; 25(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 1058835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-body wear of dental composites under different loads.
    Marquis PM; Hu X; Shortall AC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 11203672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro.
    De Gee AJ; Pallav P; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1986 May; 65(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 3457819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro wear response of composite resin, amalgam, and enamel.
    Powell JM; Phillips RW; Norman RD
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(6):1183-95. PubMed ID: 1059657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.