These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8740383)

  • 1. Use of synthetic material in sling surgery: a minimally invasive approach.
    Norris JP; Breslin DS; Staskin DR
    J Endourol; 1996 Jun; 10(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 8740383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urethral erosion following autologous rectus fascial pubovaginal sling.
    Webster TM; Gerridzen RG
    Can J Urol; 2003 Dec; 10(6):2068-9. PubMed ID: 14704112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized controlled trial of pubovaginal sling versus vaginal wall sling for stress urinary incontinence.
    Viseshsindh W; Kochakarn W; Waikakul W; Roongruangsilp U; Siripornpinyo N; Viseshsindh V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Apr; 86(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 12757074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling.
    Milose JC; Sharp KM; He C; Stoffel J; Clemens JQ; Cameron AP
    J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):916-20. PubMed ID: 25245488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome.
    Amundsen CL; Flynn BJ; Webster GD
    J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):134-7; discussion 137. PubMed ID: 12796665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tension-free vaginal tape and percutaneous vaginal tape sling procedures.
    Rackley RR; Abdelmalak JB; Tchetgen MB; Madjar S; Jones S; Noble M
    Tech Urol; 2001 Jun; 7(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 11384000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pubovaginal bone anchor fixation with polyethylene versus fascia lata slings in the treatment of female stress incontinence: sling material and processing are predominant factors in success.
    Schulte-Baukloh H; Thalau F; Stürzebecher B; Knispel HH
    Can J Urol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):2581-7. PubMed ID: 15877939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transobturator approach to suburethral sling placement in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.
    Shindel AW; Ruiz AC; Klutke CG
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2005 Sep; 2(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 16293073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Broad based tension-free synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year outcome.
    Shah DK; Paul EM; Amukele S; Eisenberg ER; Badlani GH
    J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):849-51. PubMed ID: 12913714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
    Silva-Filho AL; Cândido EB; Noronha A; Triginelli SA
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Feb; 273(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 16189692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative study among autologous and synthetic slings in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence].
    De Vita D; Araco F; Aydar Natalin R; Riccetto C; Nardi Pedro R; Palma P
    Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Dec; 60(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 18981974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Ibero-American experience with a re-adjustable minimally invasive sling.
    Palma PC; Dambros M; Riccetto CZ; Thiel M; Netto NR
    BJU Int; 2005 Feb; 95(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 15679790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I-STOP TOMS transobturator male sling, a minimally invasive treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence: continence improvement and tolerability.
    Grise P; Vautherin R; Njinou-Ngninkeu B; Bochereau G; Lienhart J; Saussine C;
    Urology; 2012 Feb; 79(2):458-63. PubMed ID: 22188755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of slings made of indigenous and allogenic material (Goretex) in type III urinary incontinence and comparison between them.
    Barbalias G; Liatsikos E; Barbalias D
    Eur Urol; 1997; 31(4):394-400. PubMed ID: 9187896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric fascia and bone anchors: disappointing early results.
    Carbone JM; Kavaler E; Hu JC; Raz S
    J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1605-11. PubMed ID: 11342927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term clinical and urodynamic evaluation of the polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence.
    Weinberger MW; Ostergard DR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 7784030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biocompatibility assessment of synthetic sling materials for female stress urinary incontinence.
    Gomelsky A; Dmochowski RR
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1171-81. PubMed ID: 17698123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of urinary incontinence severity after autologous fascia pubovaginal sling, pubovaginal sling and tension-free vaginal tape.
    Morgan DM; Dunn RL; Fenner DE; Faerber G; DeLancey JO; McGuire EJ; Wei JT
    J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):604-8; discussion 608-9. PubMed ID: 17222642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence.
    Mitsui T; Tanaka H; Moriya K; Kakizaki H; Nonomura K
    Int J Urol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1076-9. PubMed ID: 18036043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sling location in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence following midurethral sling.
    Gilchrist AS; Rovner ES
    Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 22014964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.