These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data. I: Time needed for interpretation. Verheij R; Hoeke JO; Bonke B; van Strik R; Gelsema ES Methods Inf Med; 1997 Jan; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9121369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Programming spreadsheet graphics on a PC. Farnham R MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Mar; 23(3):67-8. PubMed ID: 10110210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Methods for information system in laboratory medicine--present and future]. Okada M; Yakata M Rinsho Byori; 1990 Jan; Spec No 83():152-8. PubMed ID: 2319707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. On the interpretation of affirmative follow-up tests in immunoassays: what must not be done? Ismail AA Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Jul; 43(Pt 4):249-51. PubMed ID: 16824273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Approved recommendation on IFCC methods for the measurement of catalytic concentration of enzymes. Part 8. IFCC Method for Lactate Dehydrogenase (l-Lactate: NAD+Oxidoreductase, EC 1.1.1.27). International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Bais R; Philcox M Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1994 Aug; 32(8):639-55. PubMed ID: 7819436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Unit-independent reporting of laboratory test results. Mayer M; Chou D; Eytan T Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Jan; 39(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 11256801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Insufficient filling of vacuum tubes as a cause of microhemolysis and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. Use of a data-mining technique in evaluation of questionable laboratory test results. Tamechika Y; Iwatani Y; Tohyama K; Ichihara K Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 16681441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A rule-based decision support application for laboratory investigations management. Boon-Falleur L; Sokal E; Peters M; Ketelslegers JM Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():314-8. PubMed ID: 8563292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved laboratory test selection and enhanced perception of test results as tools for cost-effective medicine. Mayer M; Wilkinson I; Heikkinen R; Orntoft T; Magid E Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Sep; 36(9):683-90. PubMed ID: 9804391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assurance study of cardiac isoenzyme utilization in a large teaching hospital. Saxena S; Anderson DW; Kaufman RL; Hannah JA; Wong ET Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Feb; 117(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 8427567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Erratum to "Interpreting complex urinary patterns with MDI LABLINK: a statistical evaluation". Regeniter A; Siede WH; Scholer A; Huber P; Frischmuth N; Steiger JU Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Nov; 301(1-2):229-30. PubMed ID: 11020477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinically useful limits (CUL) criteria best based on within-subject biologic variation. Fraser CG Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 Aug; 92(2):256-7. PubMed ID: 2756946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An inexpensive modification of the laboratory computer display changes emergency physicians' work habits and perceptions. Marinakis HA; Zwemer FL Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Feb; 41(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 12548267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Expert systems for the interpretation of serum proteins. Ritchie RF Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 36(11):815-23. PubMed ID: 9877086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]