These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

801 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8742641)

  • 1. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of mitogenomic information in teleostean molecular phylogenetics: a tree-based exploration under the maximum-parsimony optimality criterion.
    Miya M; Nishida M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Dec; 17(3):437-55. PubMed ID: 11133198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rapid heuristic algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
    Rodin A; Li WH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Aug; 16(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 10942605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogenetic performance of mitochondrial protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates.
    Zardoya R; Meyer A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Sep; 13(7):933-42. PubMed ID: 8752002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correct and incorrect vertebrate phylogenies obtained by the entire mitochondrial DNA sequences.
    Takezaki N; Gojobori T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 May; 16(5):590-601. PubMed ID: 10335652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiencies of genes and accuracy of tree-building methods in recovering a known Drosophila genealogy.
    Steinbachs JE; Schizas NV; Ballard JW
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():606-17. PubMed ID: 11262978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochondrial DNA.
    Reeves JH
    J Mol Evol; 1992 Jul; 35(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 1518082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Basal jawed vertebrate phylogeny inferred from multiple nuclear DNA-coded genes.
    Kikugawa K; Katoh K; Kuraku S; Sakurai H; Ishida O; Iwabe N; Miyata T
    BMC Biol; 2004 Mar; 2():3. PubMed ID: 15070407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tempo and mode of mitochondrial DNA evolution in vertebrates at the amino acid sequence level: rapid evolution in warm-blooded vertebrates.
    Adachi J; Cao Y; Hasegawa M
    J Mol Evol; 1993 Mar; 36(3):270-81. PubMed ID: 8483165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.