These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 874304)

  • 1. Cytological differentiation and sexual isolation between populations of Drosophila nigricruria.
    Wasserman M; Koepfer HR
    J Hered; 1977; 68(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 874304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
    Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetics of sexual isolation based on courtship song between two sympatric species: Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa.
    Yamada H; Matsuda M; Oguma Y
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):225-37. PubMed ID: 12555781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
    Massie KR; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An X chromosome effect responsible for asymmetric reproductive isolation between male Drosophila virilis and heterospecific females.
    Nickel D; Civetta A
    Genome; 2009 Jan; 52(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19132071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studies of the species barrier between Drosophila subobscura and D. madeirensis V: the importance of sex-linked inversion in preserving species identity.
    Khadem M; Camacho R; Nóbrega C
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):1263-73. PubMed ID: 21443648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drosophila bipectinata species complex.
    Singh S; Singh BN
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2001 Sep; 39(9):835-44. PubMed ID: 11831362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of individual chromosomes on sex behavior of Drosophila].
    Aslanian IM; Romanova LG; Markelova NA
    Genetika; 1990 Sep; 26(9):1591-6. PubMed ID: 2079205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic analysis of female mating recognition between Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa: application of interspecific mosaic genome lines.
    Sawamura K; Zhi H; Setoguchi K; Yamada H; Miyo T; Matsuda M; Oguma Y
    Genetica; 2008 Jun; 133(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 17768595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IX. Host plant and population specific epicuticular hydrocarbon expression influences mate choice and sexual selection.
    Havens JA; Etges WJ
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):562-76. PubMed ID: 23286346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microsatellite variation among diverging populations of Drosophila mojavensis.
    Ross CL; Markow TA
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Sep; 19(5):1691-700. PubMed ID: 16910998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pattern of sexual isolation between parental races (Drosophila nasuta nasuta and D.n. albomicans) and the newly evolved races (Cytorace I and II).
    Ramachandra NB; Ranganath HA
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1994 Feb; 32(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 8045622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population genetics of Mexican Drosophila. I. Chromosomal variation in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura from Central Mexico.
    Dobzhansky T; Felix R; Guzmán J; Levine L; Olvera O; Powell JR; de la Rosa ME; Salceda VM
    J Hered; 1975; 66(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 1165399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The genetic basis of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to mating preference.
    Moehring AJ; Llopart A; Elwyn S; Coyne JA; Mackay TF
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):215-23. PubMed ID: 16510787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
    Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. III. Life-history divergence in allopatry and reproductive isolation.
    Etges WJ; De Oliveira CC; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3549-69. PubMed ID: 20681983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolutionary relationships of Drosophila mojavensis geographic host races and their sister species Drosophila arizonae.
    Reed LK; Nyboer M; Markow TA
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 16(5):1007-22. PubMed ID: 17305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New studies of the alcohol dehydrogenase cline in D. melanogaster from Mexico.
    Pipkin SB; Franklin-Springer E; Law S; Lubega S
    J Hered; 1976; 67(5):258-66. PubMed ID: 827556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.