These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 874420)

  • 21. The neural substrates of visual perceptual learning of words: implications for the visual word form area hypothesis.
    Xue G; Poldrack RA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1643-55. PubMed ID: 18271738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Equivalence formation by mentally retarded and nonretarded children using pictorial and printed word stimulus items.
    Stephens WE; Nopar RA; Gillam LD
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Sep; 76(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 5147223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving the visual discrimination of mentally retarded children: a training strategy.
    Crawford KA; Siegel PS
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Nov; 87(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 7180891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Control by the auditory or the visual element of a compound discriminative stimulus: effects of feedback.
    LoLordo VM; Furrow DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Mar; 25(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 932617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Errorless discrimination and picture fading as techniques for teaching sight words to TMR students.
    Walsh BF; Lamberts F
    Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Mar; 83(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 426007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of auditory and pictorial-auditory stimulus enrichment on the verbal abstracting abilities of low-SES children.
    Call RJ; Switzky HN
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Nov; 80(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 1190265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the relation between Pavlovian occasion-setting and instrumental discriminative stimuli: a blocking analysis.
    Ross RT; LoLordo VM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jan; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3819650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The functional neuroanatomy of metrical stress evaluation of perceived and imagined spoken words.
    Aleman A; Formisano E; Koppenhagen H; Hagoort P; de Haan EH; Kahn RS
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Feb; 15(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 15269107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eye movements and conservation acceleration in mildly retarded children.
    Boersma FJ; Wilton KM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 May; 80(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 961728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual recognition in mentally retarded adolescents: cue value and instruction effects.
    Fisher MA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Jan; 82(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 623155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responding by exclusion in Wistar rats in a simultaneous visual discrimination task.
    Felipe de Souza M; Schmidt A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 25220019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using stimulus shaping and fading to establish stimulus control in normal and retarded children.
    Smeets PM; Lancioni GE; Hoogeveen FR
    J Ment Defic Res; 1984 Sep; 28 ( Pt 3)():207-18. PubMed ID: 6492138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Establishing control by spoken words with profoundly mentally retarded individuals.
    Stoddard LT; McIlvane WJ
    Res Dev Disabil; 1989; 10(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 2727362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of S+ and S- separation on gradient shifts in humans.
    Derenne A
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Apr; 133(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 16705909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of training on response latency and accuracy for a difficult visual discrimination.
    Whitaker LA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):475-8. PubMed ID: 7255061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of sounds and words as sample stimuli for discrimination training.
    Halbur M; Kodak T; Williams X; Reidy J; Halbur C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):1126-1138. PubMed ID: 33759461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention to stimulus presentation mode as a function of sex.
    Perelle IB
    J Psychol; 1979 Jul; 102(2d Half):225-33. PubMed ID: 480267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Observation learning in cats.
    John ER; Chesler P; Bartlett F; Victor I
    Science; 1968 Mar; 159(3822):1489-91. PubMed ID: 5732493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.