These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744232)

  • 1. Impacts of cytoplasmic inheritance on genetic evaluations.
    Boettcher PJ; Kuhn MT; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Apr; 79(4):663-75. PubMed ID: 8744232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variance caused by cytoplasmic line and sire by herd interaction effects for milk yield considering estimation bias.
    Rorato PR; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Jul; 82(7):1574-80. PubMed ID: 10416173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variances of direct genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, and cytoplasmic inheritance effects for milk yield, fat yield, and fat percentage.
    Albuquerque LG; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Feb; 81(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 9532509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Superiority of QTL-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Abdel-Azim G; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jul; 85(7):1869-80. PubMed ID: 12201538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of synchronization on genetic parameters of reproductive traits in dairy cattle.
    Goodling RC; Shook GE; Weigel KA; Zwald NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):2217-25. PubMed ID: 15905451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of correction for heterogeneity of variance on bias and accuracy of breeding value estimation for Dutch dairy cattle.
    van der Werf JH; Meuwissen TH; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3174-84. PubMed ID: 7836606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of variance components and genetic trends for twinning rate in Holstein dairy cattle of Iran.
    Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Nejati-Javaremi A; Miraei-Ashtiani SR; Kohram H
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3411-21. PubMed ID: 19528619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data.
    Averill T; Rekaya R; Weigel K
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3681-9. PubMed ID: 16899704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic analysis of somatic cell score in Norwegian cattle using random regression test-day models.
    Odegård J; Jensen J; Klemetsdal G; Madsen P; Heringstad B
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Dec; 86(12):4103-14. PubMed ID: 14740851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic evaluation for length of productive life with censored records.
    Vukasinovic N; Moll J; Künzi N
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2178-85. PubMed ID: 10531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of an autoregressive process to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for daily milk yield in a tropical herd of Lucerna cattle and in United States Holstein herds.
    Carvalheira JG; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Quaas RL; Duran-Castro CV
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Oct; 81(10):2738-51. PubMed ID: 9812279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporation of discrete genotype effects for multiple genes into animal model evaluations when only a small fraction of the population has been genotyped.
    Baruch E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4365-71. PubMed ID: 18946142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population.
    Sun C; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):4063-71. PubMed ID: 19620690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic analysis of male and female fertility using longitudinal binary data.
    Averill TA; Rekaya R; Weigel K
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Nov; 87(11):3947-52. PubMed ID: 15483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.