178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744499)
1. Three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosomal studies on nuclei from cytogenetic preparations by confocal microscopy.
Kahn E; Hotmar J; Bernheim A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1996 Apr; 18(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 8744499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow cytometric quantification of human chromosome specific repetitive DNA sequences by single and bicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization to lymphocyte interphase nuclei.
van Dekken H; Arkesteijn GJ; Visser JW; Bauman JG
Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 2307056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confocal fluorescence analysis of the depth and focus of cytogenetic preparations.
Kahn E; Frouin F; Hotmar J; Di Paola R; Bernheim A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 9349900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enumeration of interphase chromosomes. Comparison of visual in situ hybridization and confocal fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Becker RL; Mikel UV; Oliver WR; Sesterhenn IA
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1996 Oct; 18(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 8908313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of cosmids and telomeres in cytogenetic preparations by 3D confocal fluorescence.
Kahn E; Philippe C; Frouin F; Di Paola R; Bernheim A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 9870099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spectral and dynamic confocal fluorescence characterization of cytogenetic preparations.
Kahn E; Hotmar J; Frouin F; Di Paola M; Bazin JP; Di Paola R; Bernheim A
Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Oct; 12(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 8933908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved confocal characterization of targets in nuclei of cytogenetic preparations.
Kahn E; Coullin P; Frouin F; Todd-Pokropek A; Bernheim A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2002 Jun; 24(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12102131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of chromosome 18 and X centric heterochromatin in the interphase nucleus of cultured human cells.
Popp S; Scholl HP; Loos P; Jauch A; Stelzer E; Cremer C; Cremer T
Exp Cell Res; 1990 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2347371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicolor 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization for imaging interphase chromosomes.
Cremer M; Grasser F; Lanctôt C; Müller S; Neusser M; Zinner R; Solovei I; Cremer T
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 463():205-39. PubMed ID: 18951171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A DNA probe suitable for the detection of chromosome 21 copy number in human interphase nuclei by fluorescence in situ hybridization].
Shi Q; Shan X; Zhang J; Zhang X; Chen Y; Deng X; Huang H; Yu L; Zhao S; Zheng Q; Adler I
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 16(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9949239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization on direct hematological bone marrow smears.
Huegel A; Coyle L; McNeil R; Smith A
Pathology; 1995 Jan; 27(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 7603763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA probes: quantification by digital image analysis.
Celeda D; Aldinger K; Haar FM; Hausmann M; Durm M; Ludwig H; Cremer C
Cytometry; 1994 Sep; 17(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 8001456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluorescence intensity profiles of in situ hybridization signals depict genome architecture within human interphase nuclei.
Iourov IY; Vorsanova SG; Yurov YB
Tsitol Genet; 2008; 42(5):3-8. PubMed ID: 19140435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Labelling quality and chromosome morphology after low temperature FISH analysed by scanning far-field and near-field optical microscopy.
Winkler R; Perner B; Rapp A; Durm M; Cremer C; Greulich KO; Hausmann M
J Microsc; 2003 Jan; 209(Pt 1):23-33. PubMed ID: 12535181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome organization in the human sperm nucleus studied by FISH and confocal microscopy.
Hazzouri M; Rousseaux S; Mongelard F; Usson Y; Pelletier R; Faure AK; Vourc'h C; Sèle B
Mol Reprod Dev; 2000 Mar; 55(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 10657050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences of size and shape of active and inactive X-chromosome domains in human amniotic fluid cell nuclei.
Bischoff A; Albers J; Kharboush I; Stelzer E; Cremer T; Cremer C
Microsc Res Tech; 1993 May; 25(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 8353309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis: a study using centromeric probes 7, 8, and 12.
Zhao L; Khan Z; Hayes KJ; Glassman AB
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 9512785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of aneuploidy and aneuploidy-inducing agents in human lymphocytes using fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes.
Eastmond DA; Pinkel D
Mutat Res; 1990 Oct; 234(5):303-18. PubMed ID: 2215545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative FISH analysis of numerical chromosome 7 abnormalities in 5-micron and 15-micron paraffin-embedded tissue sections from prostatic carcinoma.
Aubele M; Zitzelsberger H; Szücs S; Werner M; Braselmann H; Hutzler P; Rodenacker K; Lehmann L; Minkus G; Höfler H
Histochem Cell Biol; 1997 Feb; 107(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 9062797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separate and variably shaped chromosome arm domains are disclosed by chromosome arm painting in human cell nuclei.
Dietzel S; Jauch A; Kienle D; Qu G; Holtgreve-Grez H; Eils R; Münkel C; Bittner M; Meltzer PS; Trent JM; Cremer T
Chromosome Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 9510507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
