181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744603)
1. Hazard evaluation in risk assessment: whatever happened to sound scientific judgment and weight of evidence?
Doull J; Rozman KK; Lowe MC
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):285-99. PubMed ID: 8744603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the science and art of risk assessment.
Doull J
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 8744586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward safer fields: using AWPA's working arrangement provisions to enforce health and safety regulations designed to protect farmworkers.
Lockard L
Rev Law Soc Change; 2004; 28(3/4):507-45. PubMed ID: 15356924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification and treatment of toxic molds.
Adams S
Occup Health Saf; 2002 Oct; 71(10):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 12416242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Damned liars].
Markowitz G; Rosner D
Epidemiol Prev; 2003; 27(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 12693286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical examination of OSHA's assessment of risk associated with workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
Rosenbaum WL; Sterling TD; Weinkam JJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Jun; 23(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 8812965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lifetime excess risk of death from lung cancer for a U.S. female never-smoker exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.
Morris PD
Environ Res; 1995 Jan; 68(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 7729384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accommodating vulnerabilities to environmental tobacco smoke: a prism for understanding the ADA.
Parmet WE; Gottlieb MA; Daynard RA
J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 10182026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.
Tong EK; England L; Glantz SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e356-66. PubMed ID: 15741361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Smoking is an occupational hazard.
Howard J
Am J Ind Med; 2004 Aug; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15273969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive?
Withers WW; Kenworthy PG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing chemical risk: societies offer expertise.
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Science; 2011 Mar; 331(6021):1136. PubMed ID: 21385698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's risk assessment guidelines.
Jarabek AM; Farland WH
Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):199-216. PubMed ID: 2274984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and breast cancer: a review by the California Environmental Protection Agency.
Miller MD; Marty MA; Broadwin R; Johnson KC; Salmon AG; Winder B; Steinmaus C;
Prev Med; 2007 Feb; 44(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 17027075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulating biotechnology.
McGarity TO
Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Control of worker exposure.
Ellenbecker MJ
J Public Health Policy; 1988; 9(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 3183044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Year-end regs: what is OSHA doing for the holidays?
Okleshen W
Health Facil Manage; 1996 Oct; 9(10):64, 66. PubMed ID: 10160385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents: what are the reproductive health risks?
Lally RM
ONS Connect; 2007 Oct; 22(10):22. PubMed ID: 17987934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The tangled web of chemical hazard regulations.
Diekemper RF
Risk Manage; 1988 Mar; 35(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 10286551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Semiannual regulatory agenda... Federal Register.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1995 Jun; 8(9):4-6. PubMed ID: 10143316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
