These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744965)

  • 1. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
    Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
    Hertzog C; Dunlosky J; Robinson AE; Kidder DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 12549580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
    Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple study trials and judgments of learning.
    Meeter M; Nelson TO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12750044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
    Scheck P; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the past to predict the future.
    Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.