These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744967)

  • 1. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
    Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial attention to serial memory: The psychological refractory period in forward and backward cued recall.
    Logan GD; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Sep; 145():101583. PubMed ID: 37429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information interference and loss in a dual task situation: Task 1, choice reaction time; Task 2, unspeeded recall.
    Hartley AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2208-2225. PubMed ID: 36349714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
    Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
    Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of central attention in retrieval from visual short-term memory.
    Magen H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 27352900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The moderating effects of stimulus valence and arousal on memory suppression.
    Marx BP; Marshall PJ; Castro F
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 18410194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forgetting is effortful: evidence from reaction time probes in an item-method directed forgetting task.
    Fawcett JM; Taylor TL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1168-81. PubMed ID: 18927035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation.
    Dell'Acqua R; Turatto M; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):777-89. PubMed ID: 11521846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
    Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.