BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744967)

  • 1. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
    Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial attention to serial memory: The psychological refractory period in forward and backward cued recall.
    Logan GD; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Sep; 145():101583. PubMed ID: 37429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information interference and loss in a dual task situation: Task 1, choice reaction time; Task 2, unspeeded recall.
    Hartley AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2208-2225. PubMed ID: 36349714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
    Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
    Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of central attention in retrieval from visual short-term memory.
    Magen H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 27352900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The moderating effects of stimulus valence and arousal on memory suppression.
    Marx BP; Marshall PJ; Castro F
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 18410194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forgetting is effortful: evidence from reaction time probes in an item-method directed forgetting task.
    Fawcett JM; Taylor TL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1168-81. PubMed ID: 18927035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation.
    Dell'Acqua R; Turatto M; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):777-89. PubMed ID: 11521846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
    Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.