These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8744970)

  • 21. Context and lexical access: implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Burgess C; Tanenhaus MK; Seidenberg MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):620-32. PubMed ID: 2526855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency.
    Segui J; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 2137524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.
    Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 8538443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
    Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision.
    Turner JE; Valentine T; Ellis AW
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1282-91. PubMed ID: 9847551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-language positive priming disappears, negative priming does not: evidence for two sources of selective inhibition.
    Neumann E; McCloskey MS; Felio AC
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Nov; 27(6):1051-63. PubMed ID: 10586580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of short-term memory in semantic priming.
    Beer AL; Diehl VA
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jul; 128(3):329-50. PubMed ID: 11678361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A retrieval account of the long-term modality effect.
    Glenberg AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):16-31. PubMed ID: 6242733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects.
    Perea M; Marcet A; Vergara-Martínez M; Gomez P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):375-383. PubMed ID: 31552796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities.
    Grainger J; Diependaele K; Spinelli E; Ferrand L; Farioli F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1256-69. PubMed ID: 14622059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The generation effect extended: memory enhancement for generation cues.
    Greenwald AG; Johnson MM
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 2811664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On obtaining episodic priming in a lexical decision task following paired-associate learning.
    Durgunoğlu AY; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Apr; 13(2):206-22. PubMed ID: 2952754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited.
    McKoon G; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Nov; 18(6):1155-72. PubMed ID: 1447546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited.
    Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 11958356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions.
    Bodner GE; Masson ME; Richard NT
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1298-311. PubMed ID: 17225510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.