These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8746181)

  • 1. Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel.
    Trimpeneers LM; Verbeeck RM; Dermaut LR; Moors MG
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 8746181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Luther F; Youngson CC
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: an in-vitro study.
    Fox NA; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 1911690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement.
    Millett D; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1993 May; 20(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 8518265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics.
    Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 8059747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology.
    Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison in shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets between five bonding systems related to different etching times: an in vitro study.
    Surmont P; Dermaut L; Martens L; Moors M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 1534199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Light cured direct bonding--is it necessary to use a primer?
    O'Brien KD; Watts DC; Read MJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 2032563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of glass-ionomers for bracket bonding--an ex vivo study evaluating a testing device for in vivo purposes.
    Ortendahl TW; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 9633174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.