These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8746237)

  • 1. Relative dispersion analysis enhances perimetric sensitivity.
    Frisén L; Rossitti S
    Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 8746237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual field profile of optic neuritis. One-year follow-up in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Spurr JO; Beck RW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 112(7):946-53. PubMed ID: 8031275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual fields interpretation.
    Larkin M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Sep; 51(9):837-42. PubMed ID: 7451800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.
    Burnstein Y; Ellish NJ; Magbalon M; Higginbotham EJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 10704548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How robust is the optic chiasm? Perimetric and neuro-imaging correlations.
    Frisén L; Jensen C
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2008 Mar; 117(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 17868042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T; Matsushima M; Shikishima K; Kitahara K
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of visual dysfunction in optic atrophy by functional magnetic resonance imaging during monocular visual stimulation.
    Miki A; Nakajima T; Takagi M; Shirakashi M; Abe H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 122(3):404-15. PubMed ID: 8794713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the optic neuritis treatment trial.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Spurr JO; Beck RW
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 128(5):543-53. PubMed ID: 10577521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Kutzko KE; Nguyen R; Brito C; Keltner JL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1998 Jan; 116(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9445208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of vision after chiasmal optic neuritis.
    Nonoyama S; Shibuya Y; Kodama T; Masuda H; Ohira A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2003 Feb; 81(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 12631030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loss of stereopsis with optic chiasmal lesions and stereoscopic tests as a differential test.
    Hirai T; Ito Y; Arai M; Ota Y; Kojima T; Sato M; Miyake Y
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Sep; 109(9):1692-702. PubMed ID: 12208719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual acuity and pattern of visual field loss at presentation in pituitary adenoma.
    Ogra S; Nichols AD; Stylli S; Kaye AH; Savino PJ; Danesh-Meyer HV
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 May; 21(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 24656736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The extent of visual field damage in chiasmal lesions--contribution to the selection of methods for visual field examination].
    Lesták J; Houst'ava L
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1995 Jul; 51(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 7656353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a continuous probability scale to display visual field damage.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Kardon RH; Crabb DP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 127(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 19506193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.