These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8746237)

  • 21. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical features associated with lesions other than pituitary adenoma in patients with an optic chiasmal syndrome.
    Mejico LJ; Miller NR; Dong LM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):908-13. PubMed ID: 15126157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Color critical fusion frequency in the Bjerrum area. Comparison experiment of glaucoma with other cases].
    Yokoi T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Apr; 76(4):219-38. PubMed ID: 4672281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neurological visual fields.
    Marks ES
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Dec; 60(12):918-27. PubMed ID: 2613995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High-pass resolution perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Clinical impressions.
    Lindblom B; Hoyt WF
    Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 1594214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing.
    Frisén L
    Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(15):1931-9. PubMed ID: 12128022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Baseline visual field profile of optic neuritis. The experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Spurr JO; Beck RW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Feb; 111(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8431161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry.
    Morales J; Weitzman ML; González de la Rosa M
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jan; 107(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 10647732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distribution of scotoma pattern related to chiasmal lesions with special reference to anterior junction syndrome.
    Schiefer U; Isbert M; Mikolaschek E; Mildenberger I; Krapp E; Schiller J; Thanos S; Hart W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 242(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 15069563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma.
    Cappin JM; Nissim S
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Jan; 93(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 1111492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
    Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential in Eyes With Temporal Hemianopia From Chiasmal Compression: Correlation With Standard Automated Perimetry and OCT Findings.
    Sousa RM; Oyamada MK; Cunha LP; Monteiro MLR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 58(11):4436-4449. PubMed ID: 28863215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Asymptomatic visual field disturbances in multiple sclerosis patients without a history of optic neuritis.
    Chorazy M; Drozdowski W; Sherkawey N; Mariak Z
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007; 41(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 17629815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 7710398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and pattern discrimination perimetry to conventional perimetry in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; LeBlanc RP; McCormick TA; Rogers JB
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Dec; 28(7):306-11. PubMed ID: 8313215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions.
    Maitland CG; Aminoff MJ; Kennard C; Hoyt WF
    Neurology; 1982 Sep; 32(9):986-91. PubMed ID: 7202169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.