These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8746939)
21. Agreement between coronary flow velocity reserve and stress echocardiography in intermediate-severity coronary stenoses. Duffy SJ; Gelman JS; Peverill RE; Greentree MA; Harper RW; Meredith IT Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 May; 53(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 11329214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fractional flow reserve: critical review of an important physiologic adjunct to angiography. Bishop AH; Samady H Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):792-802. PubMed ID: 15131533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Siebes M; Verhoeff BJ; Meuwissen M; de Winter RJ; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Circulation; 2004 Feb; 109(6):756-62. PubMed ID: 14970112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of diagnostic guidewire catheter presence on translesional hemodynamic measurements across significant coronary artery stenoses. Banerjee RK; Back LH; Back MR Biorheology; 2003; 40(6):613-35. PubMed ID: 14610312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on coronary blood flow velocity distal to coronary artery stenoses. Anderson RD; Gurbel PA Cardiology; 1996; 87(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 8793165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Doppler flow velocity measurements during coronary angioplasty. Dill H; Altstidl R; Regenfus M; Lehmkuhl H; Bachmann K Angiology; 1994 Oct; 45(10):877-82. PubMed ID: 7943939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The IMPACT Study (Influence of Sensor-Equipped Microcatheters on Coronary Hemodynamics and the Accuracy of Physiological Indices of Functional Stenosis Severity). Wijntjens GW; van de Hoef TP; Kraak RP; Beijk MA; Sjauw KD; Vis MM; Madera Cambero MI; Brinckman SL; Plomp J; Baan J; Koch KT; Wykrzykowska JJ; Henriques JP; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 27899407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship between pressure-derived collateral blood flow and diabetes mellitus in patients with stable angina pectoris: a study based on coronary pressure measurement. Nişanci Y; Sezer M; Umman B; Yilmaz E; Mercanoğlu S; Ozsaruhan O J Invasive Cardiol; 2002 Mar; 14(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11870265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [To surpass coronary luminology with interventional physiology]. Kern MJ Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 May; 90 Spec No 2():41-50. PubMed ID: 9295926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Videodensitometric quantitative angiography after coronary balloon angioplasty, compared to edge-detection quantitative angiography and intracoronary ultrasound imaging. Peters RJ; Kok WE; Pasterkamp G; Von Birgelen C; Prins M; Serruys PW Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):654-61. PubMed ID: 10731403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rationale and application of coronary transstenotic pressure gradient measurements. De Bruyne B; Paulus WJ; Pijls NH Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Nov; 33(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 7874721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Persistence of slow flow phenomenon after successful primary angioplasty--an angiographic follow-up study. Kaul U; Singh B; Singh RP; Ghose T Indian Heart J; 1997; 49(5):531-3. PubMed ID: 9505024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography. DEBATE study group. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe. Piek JJ; Boersma E; di Mario C; Schroeder E; Vrints C; Probst P; de Bruyne B; Hanet C; Fleck E; Haude M; Verna E; Voudris V; Geschwind H; Emanuelsson H; Mühlberger V; Peels HO; Serruys PW Eur Heart J; 2000 Mar; 21(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 10681487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative coronary arteriographic methods in the interventional catheterization laboratory: an update and perspective. Mancini GB J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 May; 17(6 Suppl B):23B-33B. PubMed ID: 2016479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenosis. Gould KL; Kelley KO; Bolson EL Circulation; 1982 Nov; 66(5):930-7. PubMed ID: 7127705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessing coronary stenosis: by which method and for what purpose? Bourassa MG; Lespérance J Eur Heart J; 1996 Aug; 17(8):1137-8. PubMed ID: 8869850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Hemodynamic and angiocardiographic studies of coronary artery stenosis. Kahn DR; Bookstein JJ; Lennox SC; Sloan H Ann Thorac Surg; 1966 Sep; 2(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 5970808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Physiology is back in the Cath Lab! Should we abandon angiography in the assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis?]. Botas J Rev Esp Cardiol; 2002 Mar; 55(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 11893311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of coronary stenosis severity on variability of quantitative angiography. Lane DM Am J Cardiol; 1993 Feb; 71(4):375. PubMed ID: 8427194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]