These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8747065)
1. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme. Check JH; O'Shaughnessy A; Lurie D; Fisher C; Adelson HG Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3022-7. PubMed ID: 8747065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donors. Check JH; Choe JK; Nazari A; Fox F; Swenson K Hum Reprod; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1403-8. PubMed ID: 11425820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term evaluation of implantation of fresh and cryopreserved human embryos following ovarian stimulation with buserelin acetate-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or clomiphene citrate-HMG. Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Camus M; Smitz J; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2097-106. PubMed ID: 8943509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles. Londra L; Moreau C; Strobino D; Garcia J; Zacur H; Zhao Y Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 25956363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis of oocyte donation cycles: a prospective comparison of the in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles of recipients who used shared oocytes versus those who used altruistic donors. Oyesanya OA; Olufowobi O; Ross W; Sharif K; Afnan M Fertil Steril; 2009 Sep; 92(3):930-936. PubMed ID: 18829002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology]. Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of the donor oocyte program to evaluate embryo implantation. Check JH Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 734():198-208. PubMed ID: 7978918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Fiszbajn G; Sueldo C; Hart RJ; Ciapponi A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jan; (1):CD006359. PubMed ID: 20091592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of starting ovarian stimulation on day 2 versus day 15 of the menstrual cycle in the same oocyte donor and pregnancy rates among the corresponding recipients of vitrified oocytes. Martínez F; Clua E; Devesa M; Rodríguez I; Arroyo G; González C; Solé M; Tur R; Coroleu B; Barri PN Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1307-11. PubMed ID: 25154677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols. Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oocyte and embryo donation: evaluation of 412 consecutive trials. Pados G; Camus M; Van Waesberghe L; Liebaers I; Van Steirteghem A; Devroey P Hum Reprod; 1992 Sep; 7(8):1111-7. PubMed ID: 1400935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program. Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation. Söderström-Anttila V; Vilska S Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Oct; 15(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 17908406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos. Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]