537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8747065)
1. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme.
Check JH; O'Shaughnessy A; Lurie D; Fisher C; Adelson HG
Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3022-7. PubMed ID: 8747065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donors.
Check JH; Choe JK; Nazari A; Fox F; Swenson K
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1403-8. PubMed ID: 11425820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term evaluation of implantation of fresh and cryopreserved human embryos following ovarian stimulation with buserelin acetate-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or clomiphene citrate-HMG.
Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Camus M; Smitz J; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2097-106. PubMed ID: 8943509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shared oocyte donation: society's benefits.
Moomjy M; Mangieri R; Beltramone F; Cholst I; Veeck L; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2000 Jun; 73(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 10856476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles.
Londra L; Moreau C; Strobino D; Garcia J; Zacur H; Zhao Y
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 25956363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis of oocyte donation cycles: a prospective comparison of the in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles of recipients who used shared oocytes versus those who used altruistic donors.
Oyesanya OA; Olufowobi O; Ross W; Sharif K; Afnan M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Sep; 92(3):930-936. PubMed ID: 18829002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Endometrial preparation in oocyte recipients].
Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Mayenga JM; Kulski O; Belaid Y; Grefenstette I; Belaisch-Allart J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):507-10. PubMed ID: 22906698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer.
Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of the donor oocyte program to evaluate embryo implantation.
Check JH
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 734():198-208. PubMed ID: 7978918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Fiszbajn G; Sueldo C; Hart RJ; Ciapponi A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jan; (1):CD006359. PubMed ID: 20091592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of starting ovarian stimulation on day 2 versus day 15 of the menstrual cycle in the same oocyte donor and pregnancy rates among the corresponding recipients of vitrified oocytes.
Martínez F; Clua E; Devesa M; Rodríguez I; Arroyo G; González C; Solé M; Tur R; Coroleu B; Barri PN
Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1307-11. PubMed ID: 25154677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oocyte and embryo donation: evaluation of 412 consecutive trials.
Pados G; Camus M; Van Waesberghe L; Liebaers I; Van Steirteghem A; Devroey P
Hum Reprod; 1992 Sep; 7(8):1111-7. PubMed ID: 1400935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.
Söderström-Anttila V; Vilska S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Oct; 15(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 17908406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
